38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Public Streets should not be blocked: Supreme Court on Noida residents plea

By Athira Nair      13 April, 2021 01:01 PM      0 Comments
Public Streets should not be blocked: Supreme Court on Noida residents plea

The Supreme Court on Friday ( April 9, 2021) allowed a writ petition filed by a resident of Noida who alleged that it takes her a total of two hours to commute from Noida to Delhi, instead of 20 minutes, due to road blockades. 

A bench of Justice's SK Kaul and Hemant Gupta stated in their order that public streets should not be blocked and that this was an aspect that has been emphasised repeatedly in the previous orders by the court.

Justice Kaul further observed, we are not concerned with how you resolve this issue, whether politically, administratively or judicially. But we have said this before, roads should not be blocked. This is a single mother who has to face many issues because of blocked roads.

In the hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted to the court that he is the counsel on behalf of the Delhi Government.

Accordingly, the SG requested for the impleadment of the States of Haryana and UP, which was allowed by the Court with notice waived to both the States.

The matter will be now heard on 19th April, 2021. (Case name: Monicca Agarwaal vs. Union Of India).

The Petitioner, Monicca Agarwaal, who appeared in person, submitted to the court that she stayed in Noida, and had to commute to Delhi in connection with her marketing job. She states before the court that the route that took her 20 minutes, now takes her 2 hours, due to blockades in roads. Further, she started that being a single mother with medical issues, it had become a stressful situation for her to travel to Delhi.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email