38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, May 20, 2024

Review Petition against the reduction of Navjot Singh Siddhu’s Sentence Adjourned

By LawStreet News Network      22 March, 2022 06:15 PM      0 Comments
Review Petition against Navjot Singh Siddhu

On 21st March’2022, the Supreme Court adjourned the review petition which was filed against its order of reduction of sentence of Navjot Singh Sidhu to Rs.1000 from 3 years imprisonment in a 1987 road accident case. Before the bench of Justice AM Khanwilkar and SK Kaul the review petition were listed. 

On 25th February 2022, Navjot Singh Sidhu was asked by the Supreme Court to file a reply on the miscellaneous applications seeking punishment for him for the committal of murder. The applications held that Sidhu had committed Murder whereas he was being charged under Section 323 of Indian Penal Code 1860, i.e. for causing hurt. 

The Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra who appeared for the petitioner had submitted to the Supreme Court an application which sought the enlargement of the scope of notice. 

Therefore, he referred to the Supreme Court’s judgement in Brij Pal Singh Meena to submit that a person who causes death should not be punished in the category of hurt. He argued that there was error apparent on the face of record in the judgement against which review had been sought. The 15th May 2018 verdict was taken as reference.

The Senior Advocate P Chidambaram who represented Sidhu objected the application seeking the enlargement of the scope. He submitted that, upon the analysis of the evidence it was concluded that this is not the case where the deceased’s death was caused by Sidhu.

The Senior Advocate P Chidambaram sought time to file an affidavit in this regard. He said, "It would not bring justice if the entire matter is heard again. We just got the application yesterday. Whether the judgment in Brij pal Singh Meena will apply in this case & whether 323 is correct or not? That's what your lordship wants me to address on. I will address."

A time of two weeks was granted by the Bench to Navjot Singh Sindhu to file a response to the application and also directed for the listing the matter after two weeks.

Navjot Singh Sidhu said that he had "an impeccable political and sporting career in the last three decades". Navjot Singh Sidhu through an affidavit urged the Supreme Court to not punish him more in a 33 years old road rage case.

The Affidavit states, “More than three decades have passed since the date of the incident. This Hon'ble Court in numerous cases considered fine as an adequate punishment if there has been a long passage of time from the date of offense. It is also relevant to point out that the answering respondent has had an impeccable political and sporting career in the last three decades. The respondent faced trial between 1994 and 1999 and abided by all the directions of the Trial Court and was eventually acquitted.”

It was also expressed in the affidavit that Sindhu while having undergone a sentence of 1 day has always abided by the directions of the Court below and the Apex Court.

Background of the Case

The Supreme Court Bench consisting of Justice J Chelameshwar and Justice Kishan Kaul on 15th May 2018 had acquitted Sidhu from the charge under Section 304 i.e. Culpable Homicide not amounting to Murder in the road rage case which happened in 1998. 

An appeal filed by Sidhu against a December 2006 Punjab and Haryana High Court verdict conviction and sentencing him to 3 years in jail in a road rage case for which the acquittal was granted. The Bench found Sidhu guilty under Section. 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) of the Indian Penal Code 1860, and also sentenced him with a fine of rupees 1000 only. Rupinder Singh Sandhu, his co-accused was acquitted of all the charges.

Case title: Jaswinder Singh(dead) Through Legal representative Vs Navjot Singh Sidhu and Others

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea for stay on new criminal laws

SC refuses plea to stay new criminal laws. Court deems the plea casual, noting laws aren't yet implemented. Petitioner withdraws. Laws effective from July 1, 2024.

20 May, 2024 12:58 PM
Trending Know The Law
SCBA Election Result 2024, Know the newly elected members

SCBA Election Result 2024: Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal elected President. Know the newly elected members and key office bearers leading the Supreme Court Bar Association.

20 May, 2024 03:03 PM


Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice to ED on Hemant Soren's Plea Against Arrest in Land Scam

Supreme Court issues notice to ED on Hemant Soren's plea against arrest in a land scam case, sets hearing for May 17 after senior advocate Kapil Sibal's request for an earlier date.

14 May, 2024 11:24 AM
Trending Environment
3,800 metric tonnes of solid wastes going untreated everyday in Delhi SC records concern

The Supreme Court expressed concern as 3,800 metric tonnes of solid waste in Delhi go untreated daily. The issue must be addressed promptly beyond political lines.

14 May, 2024 11:30 AM
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for review of April 26 EVM VVPAT verdict

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court to review its April 26 verdict on EVM VVPAT verification, challenging the decision that dismissed a demand for 100% vote cross-verification.

14 May, 2024 12:13 PM
Trending Judiciary
AI can’t detect consent Microsoft and Google tell Delhi High Court

Microsoft and Google tell Delhi HC that AI can't detect consent for NCII takedowns, challenging a 24-hour removal directive under IT Act's safe harbour protections.

14 May, 2024 01:33 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email