38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, January 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SAT sets aside SEBI orderimposing Rs. 10 lakhs fine against ICICI Bank

By Ishita Joshi      15 July, 2020 04:27 PM      0 Comments
SAT sets aside SEBI orderimposing 10 lakhs fine against ICICI Bank

On Tuesday, 14th July 2020, The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has set aside SEBIs order which imposed a fine of Rs. 10 lakhs on ICICI Bank for delayed disclosure about a binding agreement signed by the lender with Bank of Rajasthan in 2010. Market regulator SEBI imposed a fine of Rs. 10 lakhs in September 2019, on ICICI Bank for disclosure lapses which include delayed disclosures of the binding contract signed with Bank of Rajasthan. The ICICI Bank moved the court against the order. It also referred to the unreasonable delay of eight years in issuing the show cause notice and nine years in passing the impugned order. 

The Tribunal, in an order passed on 8th July 2020, stated that though there are laches, that by itself in the peculiar circumstances of the case, will not vitiate the proceedings but definitely the penalty amount of Rs 10 lakh imposed on the bank cannot be sustained and deserves to be substituted by a lesser penalty. ... while upholding the impugned order on merits, we modify the penalty imposed on the appellant to only a warning which will meet the ends of justice in the given facts and circumstances of the matter. It added 

Early on the morning of 18th May 2010, the Executive Director of ICICI Bank signed a binding contract with the dominant shareholders of Bank of Rajasthan recommending the merger of the two lenders. Disclosures surrounding the amalgamation were provided to the stock exchanges on the evening of the same day. The tribunal said, On the basis of the interpretation given in the impugned order itself, the finding that signing of the binding agreement was material and price-sensitive information and hence there was a delay of a trading day in making the disclosure to the stock exchanges cannot be faulted. It added, After all the charge against the appellant is one trading day's delay in disclosure, but the delay on the part of SEBI to show cause is 2,955 days from the date of the event and about 2,130 days from the date of the preliminary investigation report, which is too wide a gap to be ignored. 

The order further added, Several years delay in show-causing and concluding proceedings in such known incidence of violation/ alleged violations is a failure in effectively performing the behavior modification function of a market regulator According to the Tribunal, it was considered that the issuing of a penalty order against ICICI Bank in September 2019 for certain violations of disclosure in mid- May 2010 by the issuing of a notice of show cause on 26th June 2018 has caused harm to the bank and the order suffers from laches. 

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is the regulator of the securities and commodity market in India owned by the Government of India. It was established in 12th April 1988 and given Statutory Powers on 30th January 1992 through the SEBI Act, 1992



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

ai-judges-the-future-of-algorithmic-decision-making-in-courts
Trending Vantage Points
“AI Judges” The Future of Algorithmic Decision-Making in Courts

Can algorithms deliver justice? This article explores AI judges, constitutional challenges, ethical risks, global models, and India’s cautious path forward.

12 January, 2026 07:07 PM

TOP STORIES

borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM
leela-palace-udaipur-ordered-to-pay-10-lakh-after-housekeeping-staff-enters-occupied-room-without-consent
Trending Business
Leela Palace Udaipur Ordered to Pay ₹10 Lakh After Housekeeping Staff Enters Occupied Room Without Consent [Read Order]

Chennai Consumer Commission orders Leela Palace Udaipur to pay ₹10 lakh and refund room tariff for breach of guest privacy by housekeeping staff.

07 January, 2026 09:43 PM
sc-strikes-down-bihars-midway-change-in-recruitment-rules-for-assistant-engineers
Trending Judiciary
SC Strikes Down Bihar’s Midway Change in Recruitment Rules for Assistant Engineers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules recruitment criteria cannot be changed midway, strikes down Bihar’s retrospective amendment granting weightage to contractual engineers.

07 January, 2026 10:03 PM
only-light-and-not-any-fight-madras-hc-upholds-single-judges-order-allowing-lighting-of-lamps-on-deepathoon
Trending Judiciary
Only Light And Not Any Fight: Madras HC Upholds Single Judge’s Order Allowing Lighting Of Lamps On Deepathoon [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court upholds order allowing lighting of Karthigai Deepam at Deepathoon, rejecting public order objections and dismissing 20 appeals.

07 January, 2026 10:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email