38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Allows UPSC Answer Key Petitions, Directs High Courts for Redressal Amid Commission's Policy Shift

By Jhanak Sharma      14 October, 2025 06:58 PM      0 Comments
SC Allows UPSC Answer Key Petitions Directs High Courts for Redressal Amid Commissions Policy Shift

NEW DELHI: In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed a bunch of petitions challenging the Union Public Service Commission's (UPSC) "opaque" policy on releasing Civil Services Preliminary Examination answer keys, following the Commission's recent affidavit agreeing to publish provisional keys immediately after the prelims.

The decision, delivered by a bench comprising Justices P.S. Narasimha and A.S. Chandurkar, paves the way for enhanced transparency in future exams while granting petitioners liberty to seek redressal for past grievances through High Courts.

The Court recorded its appreciation for Amicus Curiae Senior Advocate Jaideep Gupta and Advocate-on-Record (AOR) Pranjal Kishore for their comprehensive Note recommending the immediate release of answer keys post-prelims.

This recommendation was instrumental in prompting the UPSC to concede to the demand in its counter affidavit filed in the lead case of Himanshu Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India, where the Commission outlined a new framework: provisional keys for objections right after the prelims, with final keys following the overall results.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, along with Advocates Rajiv Kumar Dubey, Rajesh G. Inamdar, and Shashwat Anand, representing groups of petitioners from the CSE 2024 and CSE 2025 preliminary cycles, urged the Bench to address their unresolved grievances, including retrospective remedies like re-evaluation or objection windows for candidates who appeared under the old policy.

While allowing all the bundled petitions, the Supreme Court directed that petitioners approach the jurisdictional High Courts for any remaining redressal, with instructions for the High Courts to hear and decide such matters expeditiously.

This ruling builds on earlier proceedings, including the August 11 petition by 28 CSE 2025 aspirants represented by Senior Advocate Devadatt Kamat, Advocates Rajesh G. Inamdar, and Shashwat Anand, which was clubbed with the Himanshu Kumar case on August 12.

The Himanshu Kumar matter, concerning CSE 2024, was last heard on July 29 before being adjourned. Today's order effectively endorses the UPSC's policy shift for upcoming cycles, potentially reshaping the fairness of India's premier civil services recruitment process.

UPSC Chairman Dr. Ajay Kumar, who had previously affirmed the Commission's commitment to court directives in a live session, is expected to oversee the implementation of the new answer key protocol.

Aspirants and legal experts hailed the verdict as a "victory for transparency," though the deferral to High Courts leaves open questions on immediate relief for over 10 lakh candidates from the 2024 and 2025 prelims. With CSE 2025 Mains results still pending, the High Courts' swift action could determine the next steps for affected examinees.

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

madras-hc-directs-ms-dhoni-to-pay-10-lakh-for-transcription-of-cds-in-defamation-suit
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Directs MS Dhoni to Pay ₹10 Lakh for Transcription of CDs in Defamation Suit [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs MS Dhoni to pay ₹10 lakh for transcription and translation of CDs in his defamation suit against Zee Media.

13 February, 2026 02:36 PM
sc-holds-successive-fir-registration-to-keep-accused-in-custody-is-abuse-of-process-grants-bail-under-article-32
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Successive FIR Registration to Keep Accused in Custody Is Abuse of Process; Grants Bail Under Article 32 [Read Order]

Supreme Court calls successive FIRs to keep accused in custody an abuse of process, grants bail under Article 32 in Jharkhand case.

13 February, 2026 02:48 PM
sc-holds-post-arbitral-award-transferee-cannot-resist-execution-reaffirms-lis-pendens-doctrine-applies-to-money-decrees
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Post-Arbitral Award Transferee Cannot Resist Execution; Reaffirms Lis Pendens Doctrine Applies to Money Decrees [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules post-arbitral award purchasers can’t block execution; lis pendens applies to money decrees under Transfer of Property Act.

13 February, 2026 02:59 PM
sc-holds-anticipatory-bail-has-no-time-limit-protection-continues-after-chargesheet
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Anticipatory Bail Has No Time Limit, Protection Continues After Chargesheet [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules anticipatory bail has no time limit, continues after chargesheet, and High Courts can’t restrict protection to investigation stage.

13 February, 2026 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email