38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 25, 2024
Breaking News
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC discards plea seeking additional attempt for students in the 2021 UPSC examination, says Appropriate Authority to look into the matter

By Richa Shah      30 October, 2020 10:52 AM      5 Comments
SC discards plea seeking additional attempt for students in the  2021 UPSC examination, says Appropriate Authority to look into the matter

On Monday (26th October 2020), the Supreme Court discarded a plea filed for the benefit of 24 UPSC students who required an additional attempt in the civil service examination in the year 2021. It dismissed the plea in consideration that the Centre had confirmed that the issue was getting considered by the suitable authority.

This plea was heard by a bench of three judges: Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari & Justice Sanjiv Khanna.

Mr. Aman Lekhni was the representative of the Union of India (DoPT), and he voiced that the issue should be looked into. The issue will be properly considered by a suitable authority when the Rules for CSE-2021 will be outlined one year from now. 

The Supreme Court stated that "The issue raised in the present writ petition is in consideration of the appropriate authority and in light of the observations made by this Court in an order dated 30.09.2020 in Writ Petition(C) No. 1012 of 2020 [Vasi Reddy Govardhan Sai Prakash & Ors. V. UPSC & Ors] needful is being done in the matter."

It was requested by the petitioner to expedite this matter. Also, freedom was granted by the bench to the petitioners to move toward the Hon'ble Court if the proposed verdict doesn't satisfy the goals of the Petitioners.

The Supreme Court said, "We leave it to the competent authorities to assuage the grievance of the petitioners, as brought before this Court in the present Writ Petition appropriately. If the proposed decision does not fulfill the aspirations of the petitioners, it will be open to them to challenge that part of the decision".

15 Applicants filed an intervention application in support of the writ petition. This appeal was discarded by the Bench and the forthcoming IAs in the above terms as well. The petitioners were represented by Senior Advocate P.S. Narsimha and Advocate Atul Agarwal. 

On the last date of hearing, the bench engaged the petitioners to serve a development duplicate on UPSC and DoPT in a plea in the interest of 24 UPSC aspirants looking for an additional attempt in the civil service examination in 2021.

Due to the Covid-19 situation, preparation of the aspirants has been disrupted and hence the grant of an additional attempt is valid according to the petitioners and also because next year the aspirants would become age-barred.

The plea stated that "It is submitted that all petitioners have/ will have crossed the maximum age prescribed for appearing in UPSC exam by the time the dates of UPSC Exam - 2021 are notified."

The petition wanted to suppress the decision dated September 9, 2020, of the Centre whereby, as per the averments, representations put forth on behalf of the petitioners' seeking grant of a one -time age and attempt relaxation in the Civil Services Examination 2021, have not been appropriately considered. 

In the Notice dated July 1, 2020, it is claimed that the applicants have properly perceived the issues faced by the applicants in regard to their planning in CSE-2020. An alternative of quitting for understudies showing up in CSE-2020 was given to competitors to forestall weariness of their attempts. 

The plea submitted to the Supreme Court reads, "However while doing so, the UPSC failed to consider the position of persons like the Petitioners who cannot withdraw/opt-out unless and until they are also provided with a one-time age relaxation" 

Keeping in mind the current situation, it is opposed that it was important to consider and allow the solicitation for age-relaxation at this stage itself because relying upon the relaxation give and the Petitioners would be in a situation to forego their chance in the Civil Servies Examination of 2020. 

"The Respondents have therefore acted arbitrarily in violation of fundamental rights of the petitioners guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution," the petitioners stated.



Share this article:



John Doe
anil narula May 01, 2021

Great blog post helpful and informative.I always read your blog . I would like to thanks for sharing this information with us .

John Doe
Anil Narula Apr 03, 2021

It is a great blog post.I am always read your blog helpful and informative tips. I like it thanks for sharing this information with us

John Doe
Anil Narula Dec 24, 2020

It is a great blog post.I am always read your blog helpful and informative tips. I like it thanks for sharing this information with us

John Doe
Gyan Sagar Dec 14, 2020

Lovely blog post. Helpful post about all student. Your blog always inspired and well quality content..I am always like your blog..Thanks for sharing this.

John Doe
Gyan Sagar Dec 10, 2020

Lovely blog post. Helpful post about all student. Your blog always inspired and well quality content..I am always like your blog..Thanks for sharing this.

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cheque-issued-for-bribe-payment-not-enforceable-under-ni-act-punjab-and-haryana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque issued for bribe payment not enforceable under NI Act: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that bribe payments do not constitute legally enforceable liabilities under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 October, 2024 10:56 AM
pune-porsche-accident-bombay-hc-rejects-anticipatory-bail-over-alleged-evidence-tampering-involving-3-lakh-bribe
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Accident: Bombay HC rejects anticipatory bail over alleged evidence tampering involving ₹3 lakh bribe [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rejects anticipatory bail in Pune Porsche accident case, citing serious evidence tampering and bribery allegations against the accused’s father.

24 October, 2024 11:07 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-plea-for-direction-to-set-up-regulatory-board-to-monitor-and-manage-ott-platforms
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for direction to set up regulatory board to monitor & manage OTT platforms

SC dismisses plea to set up a regulatory board for OTT platforms, stating the issue falls under policy matters, not for the court to intervene.

19 October, 2024 06:22 PM
a-judges-praise-of-politician-may-affect-publics-trust-in-judiciary-sc-judge-b-r-gavai
Trending Judiciary
A judge's praise of politician may affect public's trust in judiciary: SC judge B R Gavai

SC Judge B R Gavai cautions that judges praising politicians and resigning to contest elections may erode public trust and compromise judicial impartiality.

21 October, 2024 01:34 PM
complainant-cant-insist-on-deciding-plea-to-summon-other-accused-before-cross-examination-sc
Trending Judiciary
Complainant can't insist on deciding plea to summon other accused before cross examination: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules complainant can’t delay cross-examination to summon others as accused; trial court has discretion on timing under Section 319 CrPC.

21 October, 2024 01:36 PM
sc-dismisses-kejriwals-plea-against-summons-in-defamation-case-on-remarks-on-pms-academic-degree
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Kejriwal's plea against summons in defamation case on remarks on PM's academic degree

SC dismisses Kejriwal’s plea challenging summons in defamation case over remarks on PM Modi’s degree, upholding Gujarat University’s complaint.

21 October, 2024 05:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email