38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, December 19, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC dismisses plea by son of Azam Khan against cancelling election as MLA [Read Judgement]

By LawStreet News Network      08 November, 2022 09:34 PM      0 Comments
SC dismisses plea by son of Azam Khan against cancelling election as MLA

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed an appeal filed by Abdullah Azam Khan, son of senior Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan against the Allahabad High Court's order cancelling his election as an MLA from Suar constituency for being below the minimum 25 years of age at the time of filing his nomination during 2017 UP Assembly polls.

A bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and B V Nagarathna held that no manifest error was committed by the Allahabad High Court in its judgement of December 16, 2019 as it had examined all oral and documentary evidence on record.

The court pointed out in the instant case, the date of birth of the Khan throughout in his records is  January one, 1993.

Only in the year 2015 when the appellant became keen to enter into active politics, his mother of submitted an application for the first time on January 17, 2015, claiming that the appellant was born on September 30, 1990. Within three days, birth certificate was issued by the Nagar Nigam, Lucknow on January 21, 2015.    

"No probative value can be attached to the birth certificate issued from the Nagar Nigam, Lucknow," the bench said.

In her separate judgement, Justice Nagarathna said no weight can be placed on the birth certificate, issued by the Nagar Nigam, Lucknow in 2015, on the strength of an entry made in the birth register maintained by the hospital and "is created by manipulation and interpolation in the relevant hospital records."

Justice Nagarathna also concluded that the stand taken by the successful candidate that all documents pertaining to the birth certificate issued on June 28, 2012 by the office of Nagar Palika Parishad, Rampur, were burnt due to a short circuit on May 08, 2015 would suggest that the said birth certificate, wherein the date of birth of the successful candidate was recorded as January one, 1993 came to be destroyed and later cancelled were under suspicious circumstances.

The hospital records were "mired with discrepancies, over-writing and factual inaccuracies and the same cannot be ignored, so no weight can be placed on the birth certificate issued in 2015," she said.

The court also pointed out Khan got passport issued in his name with January 1, 1993 as his date of birth and travelled several countries with it.

It also rejected an ossification test which mentioned his age as 26 years, saying it cannot be accepted as conclusive proof and did not hold much water.

Khan had travelled to many foreign countries on his passports which were obtained in the year 2006 and 2012 and the visa which was granted in the year 2014 and in these documents his date of birth was shown as January one, 1993, the court noted.

"I refuse to believe that an educated individual such as the successful candidate herein, had not, in over nine years (2006 to 2015) looked at the first page of his passport and only later grasped that the date of birth entered therein was incorrect only while he was on the verge of entering politics and contesting an election to the Legislative Assembly," Justice Nagarathna said.

Khan was on March 11, 2017  elected from Suar constituency on Samajwadi Party ticket.

Unsuccessful Congress party candidate Nawab Kazim Ali Khan challenged the election on the ground that the winning candidate was not qualified to contest as he was less than 25 years of age as his date of birth was mentioned as on January 1, 1993 in Class X and all other educational certificates.

Khan's father had used his influence to project his date of birth as September 30, 1990. Earlier, a Rampur court had sent Azam Khan and his wife to jail for allegedly obtaining fake birth certificate for their son.

[Read Judgement]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-quashes-fir-against-r-ashoka-in-land-allotment-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes FIR Against R. Ashoka in Land Allotment Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes ACB FIR against Karnataka MLA R Ashoka in land allotment case, citing lack of sanction, malice and political vendetta.

18 December, 2025 07:58 PM
delhi-hc-appoints-sole-arbitrator-in-meghalaya-hotels-irctc-dispute-reiterates-bar-on-psu-curated-arbitration-panels
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Meghalaya Hotels–IRCTC Dispute; Reiterates Bar on PSU-Curated Arbitration Panels [Read Order]

Delhi High Court appoints sole arbitrator in Meghalaya Hotels–IRCTC dispute, reiterating Supreme Court’s bar on PSU-curated arbitration panels.

18 December, 2025 08:23 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM
property-tax-appeal-only-tax-amount-payable-penal-interest-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Property Tax Appeal: Only Tax Amount Payable, Penal Interest Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that municipalities cannot insist on penal interest for entertaining tax appeals; only the tax amount under Section 509(11) is required.

13 December, 2025 07:09 PM
sc-expands-ambit-of-posh-act-restrictive-interpretation-would-undermine-remedial-intent
Trending Judiciary
SC Expands Ambit of POSH Act: “Restrictive Interpretation Would Undermine Remedial Intent” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules ICC at aggrieved woman’s workplace has jurisdiction under POSH Act, rejecting restrictive interpretation and reinforcing women’s right to safety.

13 December, 2025 07:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email