38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, January 11, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC dismisses plea challenging restoration of Rahul Gandhis Lok Sabha membership with Rs one lakh

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      19 January, 2024 03:53 PM      0 Comments
SC dismisses plea challenging restoration of Rahul Gandhis Lok Sabha membership with Rs one lakh

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea for quashing August 7, 2023 notification restoring the Lok Sabha membership of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi with Rs one lakh as cost.

Finding the petition by Lucknow based advocate Ashok Pandey as "frivolous", a bench of Justices B R Gavai and Sandeep Mehta said petitions of such nature meant to only waste the precious time of the court and also of the entire Supreme Court registry.

Rahul's membership was revived in August, last year after the apex court's order staying his conviction in a 2019 criminal defamation case relating to Modi surname.

The bench noted that the court had in October 2023, dismissed a similar PIL by advocate-petitioner Ashok Pandey while imposing Rs one lakh cost on him for challenging the restoration of Lok Sabha membership of the Nationalist Congress Party leader Mohammed Faizal.

In the instant plea, Pandey claimed that the disqualification based on conviction and sentence will continue to operate till it is set aside in appeal.

He also sought a direction to the Election Commission to notify the vacancy of the Wayanad Parliament seat being held by Gandhi and holding fresh elections there.

The bench said every petition needs to go through multiple verification exercises in the court registry.

It said that exemplary cost ought to be imposed on such a petition to deter litigants from misusing the jurisdiction of public interest litigation (PIL).

In August last year, the top court restored Rahul Gandhis membership of Parliament, which he had lost because of the two-year-jail term in the 2019 criminal defamation case.

The court had then stayed the Congress leaders conviction on the grounds that the trial judge failed to explain why Gandhi deserved the maximum punishment under the law. The bench had said that continuation of Gandhis disqualification would deprive the people of his constituency of a proper representation in Parliament.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

victims-appeal-against-acquittal-can-be-summarily-dismissed-when-no-prima-facie-arguable-case-exists-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Victim’s Appeal Against Acquittal Can Be Summarily Dismissed When No Prima Facie Arguable Case Exists: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that a victim’s appeal against acquittal can be summarily dismissed under BNSS if no prima facie arguable case is shown.

10 January, 2026 12:52 AM

TOP STORIES

if-memorial-for-stan-swamy-permitted-on-private-land-no-bar-for-stupa-commemorating-victory-over-colonial-forces-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
If Memorial for Stan Swamy Permitted on Private Land, No Bar for Stupa Commemorating Victory Over Colonial Forces: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court held that no government permission is needed to erect a memorial stupa on private patta land, citing the Stan Swamy memorial precedent.

05 January, 2026 05:35 PM
sc-denies-bail-to-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-2020-delhi-riots-conspiracy-case-grants-bail-to-five-others
Trending Judiciary
SC Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case; Grants Bail to Five Others

Supreme Court denies bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, while granting bail to five co-accused.

05 January, 2026 05:55 PM
allahabad-hc-holds-commercial-division-of-high-court-as-proper-forum-for-enforcement-of-domestic-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitration
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC holds Commercial Division of High Court as proper forum for enforcement of domestic awards in international commercial arbitration [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that domestic arbitral awards in international commercial arbitration seated in India must be enforced before the High Court’s Commercial Division.

05 January, 2026 06:11 PM
theft-worth-below-5000-is-non-cognizable-offence-under-bns-police-cannot-register-fir-without-magistrates-permission-andhra-hc
Trending Judiciary
Theft Worth Below ₹5,000 Is Non-Cognizable Offence Under BNS; Police Cannot Register FIR Without Magistrate’s Permission: Andhra HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules theft below ₹5,000 is non-cognizable under BNS; police cannot register FIR or investigate without magistrate’s permission.

05 January, 2026 07:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email