38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Grants Bail To Man Arrested Under Uttarakhand Anti-Conversion Law For Inter-Faith Marriage [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      11 June, 2025 04:15 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Grants Bail To Man Arrested Under Uttarakhand Anti Conversion Law For Inter Faith Marriage

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India has granted bail to a man who was arrested under the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act, 2018, following his marriage to a woman of a different faith.

Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma delivered the judgment, allowing the criminal appeal and setting aside the High Court’s order that had rejected the bail application.

The court addressed the case involving a criminal appeal challenging the February 28, 2025 judgment of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in BA1 No. 2576 of 2024. The appellant had been booked under FIR No. 609 of 2024, dated December 12, 2024, lodged with Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, for offences punishable under Sections 3/5 of the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act, 2018, and under Sections 318(4) and 319 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Addressing the circumstances of the case, the court noted:
“A frivolous complaint has been lodged against the appellant herein only because he is married to a lady who is following a different faith. The marriage between the parties was an arranged marriage. The facts were known to both sides. The families voluntarily decided to arrange the marriage of the appellant with the lady.”

The court observed the social pressures that led to the legal proceedings, stating:
“However, soon after the marriage, certain persons and certain organisations seemed to have objected to the marriage. This resulted in FIR No. 609 dated 12.12.2024 being lodged against the appellant herein.”

Emphasizing the fundamental right of the couple to live together, the Supreme Court declared:
“The respondent – State cannot have any objection to the appellant and his wife residing together, inasmuch as they have been married as per the wishes of their respective parents and families.”

In a crucial observation protecting the rights of the married couple, the court further stated:
“We also make it clear that the pendency of the criminal proceeding against the appellant herein would not come in the way of the appellant and his wife residing together of their own volition.”

The court directed immediate relief, ordering:
“The appellant shall be produced before the concerned Trial Court as early as possible, and the Trial Court shall release him on bail, subject to such conditions as it may deem appropriate to impose to ensure his presence in the proceedings arising out of FIR No. 609 of 2024.”

The appellant’s senior counsel argued that the complaint was frivolous and that the appellant had been in jail for nearly six months despite the marriage being arranged with the full knowledge and consent of both families.

The court imposed standard conditions for bail compliance, directing that the appellant shall extend complete cooperation in the ensuing trial and shall not misuse his liberty, with any infraction potentially leading to cancellation of bail.

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Senior Advocate, along with Ms. Manjula Gupta (AOR), Mr. Sudhir Kumar Santoshi, and Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar, Advocates, appeared for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sangal (AOR), Ms. Richa Mishra, and Ms. Mushkan Mangla, Advocates, represented the State of Uttarakhand.

Case Title: Aman Siddiqui alias Aman Chaudhary alias Raja vs. State of Uttarakhand

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM
limitation-for-continuous-breach-runs-only-till-contract-expiry-kerala-hc-clarifies
Trending Judiciary
Limitation for Continuous Breach Runs Only Till Contract Expiry: Kerala High Court Clarifies [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC clarifies that for continuous breach of contract, limitation under Article 55 starts when breach ceases; once contract ends, breach cannot continue.

30 October, 2025 01:37 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-uapa-arrests-holds-remand-courts-explanation-cannot-replace-written-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes UAPA Arrests, Holds Remand Court’s Explanation Cannot Replace Written Grounds Of Arrest [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes UAPA arrests, ruling that remand court’s explanation cannot substitute the mandatory written grounds of arrest.

25 October, 2025 11:10 AM
ngt-orders-probe-into-illegal-tree-felling-in-delhis-civil-lines-directs-action-within-three-months
Trending Environment
NGT Orders Probe into Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines, Directs Action Within Three Months [Read Order]

NGT directs Tree Officer to probe illegal tree felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines and take action under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994.

25 October, 2025 11:28 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-fir-against-cnn-news18-anchor-akansha-swarup-over-kamakhya-temple-remarks
Trending CelebStreet
Gauhati HC Quashes FIR Against CNN-News18 Anchor Akansha Swarup Over Kamakhya Temple Remarks [Read Order]

Gauhati HC quashes FIR against CNN-News18 anchor Akansha Swarup, ruling her Kamakhya Temple remarks were careless but lacked malicious intent.

25 October, 2025 11:43 AM
delhi-hc-upholds-divorce-on-cruelty-grounds-denies-alimony-to-financially-independent-wife
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Divorce On Cruelty Grounds, Denies Alimony To Financially Independent Wife [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds divorce on cruelty grounds, denies alimony to IRTS officer wife, ruling that alimony is for need-based justice, not enrichment.

25 October, 2025 12:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email