38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC defers hearing on West Bengal Government's suit against CBI probe to October 22, 2021

By Dolly Chhabda      05 October, 2021 03:53 PM      0 Comments
SC defers hearing on West Bengal Government's suit against CBI probe to October 22, 2021

The Supreme Court Monday deferred to October 22, 2021 the hearing of West Bengal government's lawsuit alleging that CBI is pressing ahead with investigation into the post-poll violence cases in the state without securing its nod as per the law.

A bench headed by Justice L Nageswara Rao clarified it would not grant any more adjournments in the matter and said it would hear the plea after the Dussehra holidays.

"Notice has been served on the Union of India before September 20, 2021 as per the office report. There is no appearance on behalf of the Union of India. List this matter on October 22. Any objections by the respondent may be filed in the meanwhile," said the bench, also comprising Justice B R Gavai.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal appeared for the West Bengal government in the matter.

The West Bengal government, in its original civil suit under Article 131 of the Constitution, referred to the provisions of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act 1946 and said that the Central Bureau of Investigation has been proceeding with the probe and filing FIRs without getting the nod from the state government as mandated under the statute.

Under Article 131 the apex court has original jurisdiction to deal with disputes between the Centre and states.

The CBI recently lodged multiple FIRs in cases of post-poll violence in West Bengal.

The state government sought a stay of investigations into the FIRs lodged into post-poll violence cases by CBI in pursuance of the Calcutta High Court order.

The plea said that as the general consent given to the central agency by the Trinamool Congress government has been withdrawn, the FIRs lodged cannot be proceeded with.

The suit filed through advocate Suhaan Mukerji also sought stay for any such FIR in future.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-upholds-eds-provisional-attachment-orders-in-international-cricket-betting-racket
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds ED’s Provisional Attachment Orders in International Cricket Betting Racket [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds ED’s provisional attachment orders in a major international cricket betting and hawala case, dismissing all petitions under PMLA.

25 November, 2025 01:03 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-different-retirement-ages-for-coast-guard-officers
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Different Retirement Ages for Coast Guard Officers [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds different retirement ages for Coast Guard officers, ruling the distinction lawful and not comparable to CAPFs’ uniform superannuation age.

25 November, 2025 01:21 PM
sc-holds-defective-affidavit-in-ibc-is-curable-not-fatal-to-petition
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Defective Affidavit In IBC Is Curable, Not Fatal To Petition [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that a defective affidavit in a Section 7 IBC application is a curable irregularity, not grounds for rejection, and stresses mandatory notice requirements.

25 November, 2025 01:46 PM
police-cannot-label-sc-st-complaints-as-civil-disputes-fir-must-be-registered-immediately-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Label SC/ST Complaints as ‘Civil Disputes’, FIR Must Be Registered Immediately: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules police cannot treat SC/ST complaints as civil disputes and must register FIRs immediately under Section 18-A without preliminary enquiry.

25 November, 2025 01:58 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email