38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, September 20, 2024
Judiciary

SC Holds Anil Ambani Guilty Of Contempt, Says Clear Dues Or Face Jail Term

By LawStreet News Network      20 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments

The Supreme Court today (February 20, 2019) held Reliance Communications Ltd chairman Anil Ambani, Reliance Telecom Ltd chairman Satish Seth and chairperson of Reliance Infratel Ltd Chhaya Virani, guilty of contempt of court in the petition filed by Ericsson.

A Bench comprising of JusticesRohinton Nariman and Vineet Saran rejected the unconditional apology given by Reliance, in light of its cavalier attitude towards the highest Court of the land and said that the undertakings given by the three contemnors were false to the knowledge of the court and affected the administration of justice.

Further, the Bench also said that the contemnors willfully did not pay the money it owned Ericsson and breached the undertaking given to the Supreme Court.

The Bench directed Reliance Communications, headed by Anil Ambani to pay Ericsson Rs. 453 crorewithin four weeks. An amount of Rs 118 crore has already been deposited with the Court Registry. In case of failure to pay, the Bench stated that Chairperson Anil Ambani will have to undergo three months imprisonment.

Additionally, a fine of Rs 1 crore was imposed on each of the companies, who have to deposit the same with the Supreme Court Registry. In case of failure to deposit the fine of Rs 1 crore, each of the three Directors of the companies will have to undergo one month imprisonment.

Earlier on two occasions, the apex court had ordered Reliance to pay Rs. 550 crores to Ericsson towards settlement of dues, however, Reliance failed to make the payment which led Ericsson to move the Supreme Court.

Ericsson in its contempt petition contended that Reliance had committed gross contempt by disobeying orders of the Supreme Court.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

delhi-hc-orders-mcd-to-pay-10-lakh-compensation-in-minors-death-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC orders MCD to pay ₹10 Lakh compensation in minor's death case [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC directs MCD to pay ₹10 lakh for a minor's death due to negligence, applying res ipsa loquitur and affirming compensation for fundamental rights violations.

19 September, 2024 10:36 AM
sc-orders-release-of-convict-on-personal-bond-cites-injustice-in-denying-bail-due-to-inability-to-furnish-local-surety
Trending Judiciary
SC orders release of convict on Personal Bond, cites injustice in denying bail due to inability to furnish Local Surety [Read Order]

SC: Justice delivery mechanism must consider plight of indigent convicts unable to furnish local surety, orders release of convict on personal bond.

19 September, 2024 11:05 AM

TOP STORIES

rajasthan-hc-orders-10-year-passport-for-undertrial-in-matrimonial-dispute-cites-right-to-livelihood
Trending Judiciary
Rajasthan HC orders 10-year passport for undertrial in matrimonial dispute, cites right to livelihood [Read Order]

Rajasthan HC directs issuance of a 10-year passport to an undertrial in a matrimonial dispute, upholding the right to livelihood despite ongoing legal proceedings.

14 September, 2024 05:04 PM
himachal-pradesh-hc-clarifies-the-scope-of-section-482-crpc-in-compoundable-offences
Trending Judiciary
Himachal Pradesh HC clarifies the scope of Section 482 CrPC in compoundable offences [Read Order]

Himachal Pradesh HC clarifies that Section 482 CrPC cannot be invoked for compoundable offences when an alternative remedy under Section 320(1) is available.

14 September, 2024 05:36 PM
sc-bars-kejriwal-from-commenting-on-cbi-case-in-liquor-policy
Trending Judiciary
SC bars Kejriwal from commenting on CBI case in liquor policy

SC restrains Kejriwal from commenting on CBI case in liquor policy, grants bail with conditions, prohibiting visits to CM office and signing files.

16 September, 2024 10:33 AM
sc-rejects-plea-to-re-appear-in-neet-ug-for-not-being-allowed-to-carry-handkerchief
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects plea to re-appear in NEET UG for not being allowed to carry handkerchief [Read Judgment]

SC dismisses NEET UG candidate's plea to reappear due to a handkerchief ban, citing no significant impact on performance from hyperhidrosis during the exam.

16 September, 2024 10:37 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email