38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Holds Anil Ambani Guilty Of Contempt, Says Clear Dues Or Face Jail Term

By LawStreet News Network      20 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments

The Supreme Court today (February 20, 2019) held Reliance Communications Ltd chairman Anil Ambani, Reliance Telecom Ltd chairman Satish Seth and chairperson of Reliance Infratel Ltd Chhaya Virani, guilty of contempt of court in the petition filed by Ericsson.

A Bench comprising of JusticesRohinton Nariman and Vineet Saran rejected the unconditional apology given by Reliance, in light of its cavalier attitude towards the highest Court of the land and said that the undertakings given by the three contemnors were false to the knowledge of the court and affected the administration of justice.

Further, the Bench also said that the contemnors willfully did not pay the money it owned Ericsson and breached the undertaking given to the Supreme Court.

The Bench directed Reliance Communications, headed by Anil Ambani to pay Ericsson Rs. 453 crorewithin four weeks. An amount of Rs 118 crore has already been deposited with the Court Registry. In case of failure to pay, the Bench stated that Chairperson Anil Ambani will have to undergo three months imprisonment.

Additionally, a fine of Rs 1 crore was imposed on each of the companies, who have to deposit the same with the Supreme Court Registry. In case of failure to deposit the fine of Rs 1 crore, each of the three Directors of the companies will have to undergo one month imprisonment.

Earlier on two occasions, the apex court had ordered Reliance to pay Rs. 550 crores to Ericsson towards settlement of dues, however, Reliance failed to make the payment which led Ericsson to move the Supreme Court.

Ericsson in its contempt petition contended that Reliance had committed gross contempt by disobeying orders of the Supreme Court.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email