38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Why Wasn't BJP Activist Released Immediately': SC Issues Contempt Notice To WB Govt Over Meme Row

By LawStreet News Network      01 July, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
'Why Wasn't BJP Activist Released Immediately': SC Issues Contempt Notice To WB Govt Over Meme Row

The Supreme Court today (July 1, 2019) issued notice to Mamta Banerjee led West Bengal Government on a contempt plea filed by the brother of BJP Yuva Morcha Convenor Priyanka Sharma.

In the plea, her brother alleges that despite apex courts order on May 14, 2019, directing the State of West Bengal to release the BJP worker, she wasn't released by police immediately.

The Government has been asked to give its reply within four weeks.

The BJP worker was arrested on May 10, 2019, under Information Technology Act, 2000, for sharing an offensive meme on social media wherein state Chief Minister Mamata Banerjees face was superimposed on Priyanka Chopras recent Met Gala costume.

The meme posted on 9 May 2019 had gone viral after the news of the arrest broke.

Contending that the arrest and custody of Priyanka Sharma was illegal, her brother moved a habeas corpus petition in the Supreme Court seeking her immediate release.

On May 14, a vacation Bench of Justices Indira Banerjee and Sanjiv Khanna directed the immediate release of Sharma from jail. However, the Bench also directed her to tender written apology for sharing the meme, with a clarification that bail is not contingent on the tendering of apology and the two issues are not inter-linked.

Next day, Sharma's lawyer mentioned in the court that she has not been released despite the order. To this, the counsel appearing for the West Bengal government informed the Bench that Sharma was released from jail at around 9:40 am on May 15, 2019. Terming her arrest as prima facie arbitrary, the Bench rapped the government for the delay and warned of contempt action.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email