38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 20, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Why Wasn't BJP Activist Released Immediately': SC Issues Contempt Notice To WB Govt Over Meme Row

By LawStreet News Network      01 July, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
'Why Wasn't BJP Activist Released Immediately': SC Issues Contempt Notice To WB Govt Over Meme Row

The Supreme Court today (July 1, 2019) issued notice to Mamta Banerjee led West Bengal Government on a contempt plea filed by the brother of BJP Yuva Morcha Convenor Priyanka Sharma.

In the plea, her brother alleges that despite apex courts order on May 14, 2019, directing the State of West Bengal to release the BJP worker, she wasn't released by police immediately.

The Government has been asked to give its reply within four weeks.

The BJP worker was arrested on May 10, 2019, under Information Technology Act, 2000, for sharing an offensive meme on social media wherein state Chief Minister Mamata Banerjees face was superimposed on Priyanka Chopras recent Met Gala costume.

The meme posted on 9 May 2019 had gone viral after the news of the arrest broke.

Contending that the arrest and custody of Priyanka Sharma was illegal, her brother moved a habeas corpus petition in the Supreme Court seeking her immediate release.

On May 14, a vacation Bench of Justices Indira Banerjee and Sanjiv Khanna directed the immediate release of Sharma from jail. However, the Bench also directed her to tender written apology for sharing the meme, with a clarification that bail is not contingent on the tendering of apology and the two issues are not inter-linked.

Next day, Sharma's lawyer mentioned in the court that she has not been released despite the order. To this, the counsel appearing for the West Bengal government informed the Bench that Sharma was released from jail at around 9:40 am on May 15, 2019. Terming her arrest as prima facie arbitrary, the Bench rapped the government for the delay and warned of contempt action.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

priests-who-have-travelled-abroad-cannot-enter-sanctum-sanctorum-andhra-pradesh-hc-orders-strict-compliance-with-2010-circular
Trending Judiciary
Priests Who Have Travelled Abroad Cannot Enter Sanctum Sanctorum: Andhra Pradesh HC Orders Strict Compliance with 2010 Circular [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court directs strict enforcement of 2010 circular barring priests who travelled abroad from entering sanctum sanctorum.

14 April, 2026 01:25 PM
advocate-challenges-punjab-and-haryana-high-courts-refusal-of-senior-designation-before-supreme-court-alleging-lack-of-transparency
Trending Judiciary
Advocate Challenges Punjab and Haryana High Court’s Refusal of Senior Designation Before Supreme Court, Alleging Lack of Transparency

Supreme Court to hear plea challenging Punjab & Haryana HC’s senior designation process, alleging lack of transparency, fairness, and procedural irregularities.

14 April, 2026 01:39 PM
delhi-hc-hears-arvind-kejriwals-recusal-plea-against-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma-in-excise-policy-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Hears Arvind Kejriwal’s Recusal Plea Against Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in Excise Policy Case

Delhi HC hears Arvind Kejriwal’s plea seeking recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in excise policy case, alleging apprehension of bias.

14 April, 2026 02:19 PM
delhi-hc-rules-in-favour-of-impressarios-social-restaurant-chain-in-trademark-dispute-orders-removal-of-social-house-mark
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rules in Favour of Impressario’s ‘SOCIAL’ Restaurant Chain in Trademark Dispute, Orders Removal of ‘SOCIAL HOUSE’ Mark [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court orders removal of ‘SOCIAL HOUSE’ trademark for non-use, rules in favour of Impressario in major trademark dispute.

14 April, 2026 02:28 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email