38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Issues Notice To Baba Ramdev On Book Publishers Plea Against HC Order

By LawStreet News Network      01 December, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SC Issues Notice To Baba Ramdev On Book Publishers Plea Against HC Order

The Supreme Court on November 30, 2018, issued a notice to Yoga guru Ramdev on a plea by a publisher challenging the Delhi High Court's verdict restraining sale and publication of a book purportedly on his life.

A Bench comprising of Justices Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta was hearing a petition filed by the publisher, Juggernaut Books Private Limited against Delhi High Court's September 29, 2018, judgment.

The Delhi High Court had passed the restraining order after Ramdev claimed that the book titled "Godman To Tycoon" The Untold Story of Baba Ramdev had defamatory content and harmed his economic interests and reputation.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the publisher, told the apex court that there were "some significant" and "very interesting issues" in the matter.

The Bench also asked why the publisher has made e-commerce websites Amazon India and Flipkart Internet Private Limited, which were earlier selling the book online, parties in the plea.

"Why do you want Amazon and Flipkart (as parties) unnecessarily in this," the Bench asked and issued a notice to Ramdev only.

The Delhi High Court in its September verdict, restraining the sale, publication and distribution of the book, had said that the right to reputation of a living individual cannot be "crucified" at the "altar of the right to freedom of speech and expression" of another.

It had said the publisher was restrained from selling and publishing the book till the time the alleged objectionable portion was deleted.

The book penned by journalist Priyanka Pathak Narain was released on July 29, 2017.

After its release on August 4, 2018, Ramdev approached the trial court claiming that the allegations in the book relating to his life were incorrect.

The trial court had restrained the publisher from publishing and selling the book until further orders. It had also restrained Amazon India and Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd from selling it online and stop its pending deliveries to buyers.

On April 28, 2018, however, an additional senior civil judge (ASCJ) had removed the ban which prompted Ramdev to approach the Delhi High Court.

The Delhi High Court had stayed an order of the ASCJ lifting the ban on publication and sale of the book. It had also granted interim relief to Ramdev while hearing his plea challenging the ASCJ's order.

While restraining the publishing of the book, the Delhi High Court noted that the person about whom the book is written is a "living human being" who was entitled to be treated with dignity.

It also said that the portions of the book "which make readers think that he is an ambitious villain, until so proved in the court of law, are necessary to be restrained from being published and distributed for sale till disposal of the case pending before the lower court.

The apex court has listed the matter for further hearing in the first week of February next year.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email