New Delhi, India  
Judiciary

Supreme Court Issues Notice to Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Gorakhpur for Misleading the Court

By Neha Bharti      29 September, 2020 08:17 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Issues Notice to Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Gorakhpur for Misleading the Court

The Bench comprising of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Aniruddha Bose, and Krishna Murari has issued notice to one Ms. Manisha Waskale, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Gorakhpur, Madhya Pradesh, inquiring "Why appropriate preceding be not initiated against her for misleading this Court and as a consequence of obtaining interim orders from the bench at the threshold on September 2, 2019". 

It was pointed out by the respondent side that at page number N a reference has been made to order dated December 10, 2018, of the earlier is Special Leave Petition (C) Diary number 42226 of 2018 which is stated to have been withdrawn by the petitioner on December 10, 2018, with the liberty to move the review petition before the High Court. A copy of the order of this Court has been annexed as Annexure p-9 at page number 174, it transpires that there was no Liberty granted. 

Apart from that, the Court has observed that at page number 7, the declaration made in the terms of Rule 3 (2) referred to the final judgment and order dated January 4, 2018, passed by the High Court, and the subsequent order is reviewed and it is stated that there is no Special Leave Petition which was filed against the earlier order.

Therefore, the Court has prima facie find that both the declaration made by one Manisha Waskale at page number 13, Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Gorakhpur, Madhya Pradesh are false and such declaration would amount to a false declaration before this Court. 

Thus, the Court decline any further adjournment and direct notice to be issued to Ms. Manisha Waskale "why appropriate proceeding is not initiated against her for misleading this Court and as a consequence of obtaining interim order from the Bench at the threshold on September 2nd, 2019". 

The next date given by the Bench to hear the case is October 5, 2020.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-reconstitutes-gender-sensitisation-and-internal-complaints-committee-justice-bv-nagarathna-continues-as-chairperson
Trending Judiciary
SC Reconstitutes Gender Sensitisation and Internal Complaints Committee; Justice B.V. Nagarathna Continues as Chairperson [Read Order]

Supreme Court reconstitutes Gender Sensitisation and Internal Complaints Committee; Justice B.V. Nagarathna continues as Chairperson.

28 May, 2026 11:26 AM
promissory-estoppel-cannot-be-used-to-claim-benefits-not-meant-for-industry-class-sc
Trending Judiciary
Promissory Estoppel Cannot Be Used to Claim Benefits Not Meant for Industry Class: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules promissory estoppel cannot be used to claim industrial benefits never intended for that class of enterprise.

28 May, 2026 04:23 PM

TOP STORIES

senior-citizens-need-not-be-penniless-or-destitute-to-seek-protection-under-2007-act-gauhati-hc-upholds-sons-eviction
Trending Judiciary
Senior Citizens Need Not Be “Penniless or Destitute” To Seek Protection Under 2007 Act: Gauhati HC Upholds Son’s Eviction [Read Order]

Gauhati High Court upheld sons’ eviction from their 86-year-old father’s house, ruling senior citizens need not be destitute to seek relief.

23 May, 2026 02:19 PM
threat-to-leak-bath-video-violates-womans-dignity-chastity-sc
Trending Judiciary
Threat to Leak Bath Video Violates Woman’s Dignity, Chastity: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that threatening to upload a woman’s bath video amounts to imputing unchastity and violates dignity and sexual autonomy.

23 May, 2026 02:27 PM
sc-questions-reservation-for-children-of-high-ranking-ias-officers
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Reservation for Children of High-Ranking IAS Officers

Supreme Court questions OBC reservation for children of IAS officers, saying socially advanced families should ideally move out of quota benefits.

23 May, 2026 02:44 PM
bombay-hc-considers-framing-21-point-interim-guidelines-for-protection-of-advocates-from-violence
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Considers Framing 21-Point Interim Guidelines for Protection of Advocates from Violence [Read Order]

Bombay HC considers 21-point interim guidelines to protect advocates from violence, including safeguards against arrest and intimidation.

23 May, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email