38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, January 14, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC notice to Centre on delay in appointment of judges [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      11 November, 2022 10:39 PM      0 Comments
SC notice to Centre on delay in appointment of judges

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Union law secretary over delay in issuing appointment orders on judges selected by the Collegium for High Courts and the top court, saying keeping the names pending was not acceptable since it makes the cause of law and justice suffer.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Abhay S Oka expressed its displeasure while noting that there are 11 names pending the Union government's approval, the oldest of which dates back to September 2021.

"This implies that the government neither appoints the names nor communicates its reservations, if any. There are also 10 names pending with the government which have been reiterated by the Supreme Court Collegium," the bench said.

"The cause of law and justice suffers as a result, (of not judges being appointed to SC, HCs), as the central government neither approved the names nor stated its reservations," the bench said.

The court said keeping the names pending and not clearing them is not "acceptable".

The bench sought explanation on the issue for delay in appointment of judges to Supreme Court and High Courts on a contempt petition filed by Advocates Association, Bangalore.

In view of delay, the courts are losing chance to have eminent persons on the bench. Withholding names is not acceptable, the bench said.

The bench, however, pointed out for the time being,  the court was resisting in issuing contempt notice and issuing only simple notice on contempt petition filed against the law ministry.

Among the names, reconsideration has been sought in cases where despite a second reiteration the government did not clear the names, and the persons withdrew their names, the bench said.

Senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for the petitioner, asked the court to initiate contempt proceedings against the senior officers, as even a recommendation made for elevation of Bombay High Court judge, Justice Dipankar Dutta to the Supreme Court, has been kept as pending.

[Read Order] 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-directs-centre-to-verify-aibe-status-of-empanelled-supreme-court-lawyers-orders-policy-formulation
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Directs Centre to Verify AIBE Status of Empanelled Supreme Court Lawyers; Orders Policy Formulation

Delhi High Court gives Centre 8 weeks to verify AIBE status of 650 empanelled Supreme Court lawyers and directs formulation of a transparent empanelment policy.

08 January, 2026 12:24 AM
delhi-hc-rejects-civil-suit-challenging-cirp-affirms-nclts-exclusive-jurisdiction-under-ibc
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rejects Civil Suit Challenging CIRP, Affirms NCLT’s Exclusive Jurisdiction Under IBC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court dismisses civil suit challenging CIRP, holds NCLT has exclusive jurisdiction under IBC, bars parallel civil proceedings.

08 January, 2026 12:37 AM
sc-orders-release-of-accused-detained-under-nsa-in-caste-based-humiliation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders Release of Accused Detained Under NSA in Caste-Based Humiliation Case [Read Order]

Supreme Court orders release of accused detained under NSA in a caste-based humiliation case and stays Madhya Pradesh High Court’s preventive detention directions.

08 January, 2026 01:25 AM
sc-grants-bail-to-amtek-auto-promoter-in-money-laundering-case-holds-prolonged-incarceration-without-trial-progress-violates-article-21
Trending Judiciary
SC Grants Bail to Amtek Auto Promoter in Money Laundering Case; Holds Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Progress Violates Article 21 [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court grants bail to Amtek Auto promoter Arvind Dham, holding prolonged incarceration without trial progress violates the right to speedy trial under Article 21.

08 January, 2026 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email