The Supreme Court on Wednesday (November 18, 2020) refused to adjourn the appeal of dismissed BSF JAWAN TEJ Bahadur Yadav challenging Narendra Modis election from Varanasi in 2019.
No, we cant adjourn the matter. You are abusing the process of lawyou go ahead with the matter. We have already adjourned the matter many times. This is an important case that revolves around the unique office of the Prime Minister. You have made the Prime Minister the respondent. We cannot keep it pending indefinitely, Chief Justice of India S.A. Bobde, heading a bench also comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, told the counsel for the petitioner.
A bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobdemade the observation while refusing to accede to the request of, advocate appearing for Tej Bahadur for either adjourning the case or at least pass over the case.
Besides challenging the rejection of his nomination papers, Yadav wanted the result of Modis win set aside and declared as void.
The returning officer for the constituency had rejected Yadavs nomination papers on May 1, 2019, on the ground that he had concealed the factum of his dismissal from service upon conviction in April 2017, which was a ground for disqualification for contesting elections for a period of six years under the election rules.
As soon as the case was listed on Wednesday, Yadavs counsel repeatedly urged the court to adjourn the matter to help him fully prepare with the case.
However, the CJI rejected the plea saying the matter was already adjourned on a number of occasions.
The counsel insisted that if not adjournment the court should at least pass over the matter.
We cant give you indefinite time to hear this case. You show us the evidence. Is it so important to take Passover in this case? The adjournments have gone so long for three months in the case, Justice Bobde said.
In response to a query from the bench, the counsel said Yadav had filed two nomination papers one as an Independent and another as a Samajwadi Party candidate.
The court also briefly heard senior advocate Harish Salve appearing for Narendra Modi.
The senior advocate told the bench that the high court had rightly dismissed his plea as the petitioner had failed to furnish the relevant details sought by the returning officer.
The bench later reserved the verdict. The apex court will pronounce the judgment either on Friday or next week.
Yadav, earlier dismissed by the Centre after he alleged on social media that substandard food was served to soldiers on the border, had filed two nomination papers for the Varanasi seat one as an Independent candidate on April 24, 2019, and another as an SP candidate on April 23, 2019.
He had challenged the rejection of his nomination papers in Allahabad High Court pleading that although he was dismissed from service of Government of India, the dismissal was not on the ground of corruption or disloyalty to the State, which in terms of Section 9 and Section 33(3) of The Representation of the People Act, 1951, would have acted as a bar from his contesting the election.
However, the high court on December 6, 2019, dismissed his plea on the ground that Yadav had no legal right as he was neither a voter nor a resident of Varanasi and as such his election petition was not maintainable.
