38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC orders parents to fund daughters’ education, upholds daughter’s legal right to retain Rs 43 Lakh for education [Read Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      10 January, 2025 05:48 PM      0 Comments
SC orders parents to fund daughters education upholds daughters legal right to retain Rs 43 Lakh for education

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said parents could be compelled to provide necessary funds within the limit of their financial resources for education of their daughters as they have got an indefeasible, legally enforceable, lawful, and legitimate right to secure educational expenses.

SC Ruling: Parents Must Provide Financial Support for Daughters’ Education

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan allowed a plea for divorce by mutual consent to a couple, living separately for 26 years, and urged the daughter studying in Ireland not to return a sum of Rs 43 lakh paid by her father.

The daughter has declined to take her share out of total Rs 73 lakh agreed to be paid by the husband as one time settlement, even though she was a part of settlement agreement.

Legal Right to Education: SC Upholds Daughter’s Claim for Rs 43 Lakh

"We are of the considered view that Rs 43,00,000 is an amount to which respondent no 2 (daughter) was entitled to in law. She, being the daughter, has an indefeasible, legally enforceable, lawful, and legitimate right to secure educational expenses from her parents. All that we observe is that the daughter has a fundamental right to pursue her education, for which the parents could be compelled to provide necessary funds within the limit of their financial resources," the bench said.

The bench pointed out said amount has been kept by the father without any compelling reasons, which shows that he was financially sound to the extent of providing the financial assistance to his daughter for her academic pursuits.

"The daughter has, thus, got a right to retain that amount. She need not, therefore, return that amount either to the appellant (mother) or to respondent No 1 (father), and may suitably appropriate it as she may deem fit," the bench said.

The appellant woman approached the Supreme Court challenging the Madhya Pradesh High Court's order which increased her monthly maintenance from Rs 5,000 fixed by the family court to Rs 7,000 only.

She claimed her husband's salary was more than Rs 80,000 per month she was entitled to the maintenance, keeping in view the monthly income and standard of living of the husband.

A daughter born from the wedlock lived under the care and custody of the appellant-wife, throughout.

The court referred the matter to mediation where the husband agreed to pay Rs 73 lakh --Rs 30 lakh to wife and Rs 43 lakh to the daughter.

Taking the settlement into record, the court granted divorce using its extraordinary power to do complete justice, as the couple were living separately for the last 26 years.
 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email