38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 29, 2022
Top Stories
Interviews Know The Law Book Reviews Videos
About Us Contact Us

“There Is A Need To Publicize Why The Act Was Passed” Says SC Refusing To Stay CAA, 2019

By Lawstreet Bharat      Dec 18, 2019      0 Comments      1,305 Views
“There Is A Need To Publicize Why The Act Was Passed” Says SC Refusing To Stay CAA, 2019

The Supreme Court today refused to grant an order staying the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019The court has issued notice to the Centre. The next hearing is scheduled for January 22, 2020. 

The Supreme Court heard 60 petitions filed against the CAA together. A total of 59 petitions were listed before a bench comprising of the Chief Justice of India, SA Bobde, Justices BR Gavai and Surya Kant. Among the petitioners were Jairam Ramesh of Congress, Asaduddin Owaisi of AIMIM, Mahua Moitra of TMC, RJD's Manoj Jha, the Jamiat Ulema-a-Hind and the Indian Union Muslim League.

The Attorney General of India, K.K. Venugopal argued that, “There are four judgments of the SC that say that the Act cannot be stayed.”

Rajeev Dhavan said that the Act hadn’t come into existence, its rules are yet to notified. The CJI told lawyers who were still pressing for a stay of CAA, 2019 even after the next case was called that, “We are not going to hear this case today. There is a need to publicise why the Act (CAA) is passed.” To which Venugopal agreed saying that, “We will do that.” The Chief Justice's comments had come on a submission made by Advocate AK Upadhyay that there is a lot of confusion regarding the objective of CAA, 2019.

Earlier, senior Congress leader and former Union Minister Jairam Ramesh and Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra challenged the Citizenship Amendment Act by filing petitions in the Supreme Court. The petition has sought quashing of the Citizenship Amendment Act as unconstitutional.

Jairam Ramesh's petition demanded that the Supreme Court declare the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 as a violation of the Right to Equality, and that the Court declare that this law is against the Assam Accord of 1985. Jairam Ramesh also demanded that the court declare that the Act violates international treaties that India has signed.

CitizenshipCitizenship Amendment Act
Share this article:

Lawstreet Bharat

Leave a feedback about this

Related Posts
View All



Legal Insiders
Law college professor ends life by suicide
21 days ago


Lawstreet Advertisement

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email