38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

There Is A Need To Publicize Why The Act Was Passed Says SC Refusing To Stay CAA, 2019

By Lawstreet Bharat      18 December, 2019 04:12 PM      0 Comments
There Is A Need To Publicize Why The Act Was Passed Says SC Refusing To Stay CAA, 2019

The Supreme Court today refused to grant an order staying the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019The court has issued notice to the Centre. The next hearing is scheduled for January 22, 2020. 

The Supreme Court heard 60 petitions filed against the CAA together. A total of 59 petitions were listed before a bench comprising of the Chief Justice of India, SA Bobde, Justices BR Gavai and Surya Kant. Among the petitioners were Jairam Ramesh of Congress, Asaduddin Owaisi of AIMIM, Mahua Moitra of TMC, RJD's Manoj Jha, the Jamiat Ulema-a-Hind and the Indian Union Muslim League.

The Attorney General of India, K.K. Venugopal argued that, There are four judgments of the SC that say that the Act cannot be stayed.

Rajeev Dhavan said that the Act hadnt come into existence, its rules are yet to notified. The CJI told lawyers who were still pressing for a stay of CAA, 2019 even after the next case was called that, We are not going to hear this case today. There is a need to publicise why the Act (CAA) is passed. To which Venugopal agreed saying that, We will do that. The Chief Justice's comments had come on a submission made by Advocate AK Upadhyay that there is a lot of confusion regarding the objective of CAA, 2019.

Earlier, senior Congress leader and former Union Minister Jairam Ramesh and Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra challenged the Citizenship Amendment Act by filing petitions in the Supreme Court. The petition has sought quashing of the Citizenship Amendment Act as unconstitutional.

Jairam Ramesh's petition demanded that the Supreme Court declare the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 as a violation of the Right to Equality, and that the Court declare that this law is against the Assam Accord of 1985. Jairam Ramesh also demanded that the court declare that the Act violates international treaties that India has signed.



Share this article:

About:
Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM
allegations-in-abetment-to-suicide-case-cannot-travel-beyond-contents-of-suicide-note-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Allegations in Abetment to Suicide Case Cannot Travel Beyond Contents of Suicide Note: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes abetment to suicide case against 10 accused, holds complaint cannot go beyond contents of suicide note.

02 March, 2026 01:48 PM

TOP STORIES

ncert-introduces-judicial-backlog-and-corruption-in-class-8-curriculum-highlights-47-crore-pending-cases-across-courts
Trending Judiciary
NCERT Introduces Judicial Backlog and Corruption in Class 8 Curriculum, Highlights 4.7 Crore Pending Cases Across Courts

NCERT updates Class 8 textbooks to address judicial backlog and corruption, citing 4.7 crore pending cases and accountability mechanisms in India’s courts.

25 February, 2026 11:12 AM
delhi-hc-grants-jubin-nautiyal-ex-parte-injunction-against-ai-platforms-e-commerce-sites-for-personality-rights-violations
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms, E-Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants ex parte injunction to Jubin Nautiyal against AI platforms and e-commerce sites over unauthorised use of his voice, image and persona.

25 February, 2026 12:48 PM
voluntary-confessions-under-customs-act-are-valid-evidence-for-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Voluntary Confessions Under Customs Act Are Valid Evidence for Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds voluntary confessions under Section 108 of the Customs Act are valid evidence to sustain conviction in smuggling cases.

25 February, 2026 12:54 PM
sc-rules-illegality-of-search-does-not-invalidate-evidence-seized
Trending Judiciary
SC Rules Illegality of Search Does Not Invalidate Evidence Seized [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds illegal search does not bar admissibility of seized evidence if relevant and legally admissible under law.

25 February, 2026 01:32 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email