38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Rejects Appeal Of R Bhupathi Reddy, Says It Cant Interfere In Legislative Councils Decision

By Lawstreet Bharat      07 January, 2020 01:01 PM      0 Comments
SC Rejects Appeal Of R Bhupathi Reddy, Says It Cant Interfere In Legislative Councils Decision

In an appeal preferred to the Apex Court by disqualified Telangana MLC R Bhupathi Reddy questioning the decision of the legislative council chairman to disqualify him under the 10th Schedule, the Court today (January 7, 2020) rejected it by saying that this isnt a fit case to interfere.

Earlier, the Telangana High Court had dismissed a petition filed by disqualified MLC R. Bhupathi Reddy of Nizamabad, who had filed for cancellation of his disqualification order issued by the Chairman of the Telangana Legislative Council

A division bench comprising of Chief Justice Raghavendra Singh Chauhan and Justice Shameem Akhter pronounced the judgment saying that, We do not find any illegality in the order of the Chairman.

The bench chose not to interfere with Para 8 of the 10th Schedule of the Constitution. It speaks about the power of the Council Chairman to disqualify a member. Rule 7(4) of the Members of the Council which speaks about Disqualification on Grounds of Defection, was also challenged by the petitioner.

Mr Reddy stated earlier that the rule does not lay down any criteria for the type of disqualification petitions that are to be directly dealt with by the Chairman under the power conferred under Para 6 of the 10th Schedule.

Further, the bench clarified that Para 8 of the 10th Schedule and Rule 7(4) of the Members of TSLC are constitutionally valid.

Author: Swetalana Rout



Share this article:

About:
Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email