38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC rejects ex Delhi Minister's plea to consider his bail plea

By Jhanak Sharma      25 June, 2024 03:41 PM      0 Comments
SC rejects ex Delhi Ministers plea to consider his bail plea

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a plea by former Delhi Minister Satyendar Kumar Jain to consider his plea for bail, saying let the Delhi High Court first decide the matter.

The court, however, asked the Delhi High Court to decide the bail plea without unnecessarily adjourning it.

A bench of Justices Manoj Misra and S V N Bhatti asked the High Court to take a call on the matter on July 9, the next date of hearing.

The court, however, rejected Jain's plea to tag his instant petition along with similar matters pending before it on the question whether default bail can be denied on filing of incomplete charge sheet.

Appearing for Jain, senior advocate A M Singhvi submitted the issue before the court was whether the default bail can be deferred by the court on filing of incomplete charge sheet. Since the similar and identical issue was pending before this court, Jain's plea should also be tagged along with it.

The counsel submitted the High Court could not have given six weeks adjournment in Jain's case.

The bench, however, said since such an issue was pending before a three-judge bench, it cannot take a call on this.

"We are sitting in a combination of two judges. We cannot take a call on the three judges bench case. This is just a one line order to list on July 9," the bench said.

"The facts in the instant case have yet not been decided. The High Court is yet to decide on merits. If the High Court rejects the plea, then the Supreme Court is the remedy," the bench added.

Singhvi, however, questioned six weeks adjournment, saying it has been held by the Supreme Court that such cases have to be dealt with within a period of one week.

"Let the High Court decide and then we will take a call," the bench said.

In its order, the bench said, "We have heard the counsel for the petitioner...he submits that the question of law which would govern the decision of High Court is engaging attention of this court and thus this matter be tagged with Supreme Court case. We do not find merit in that submission as High Court is yet to take a call and if HC takes a decision then a remedy is before Supreme Court. It goes without saying that bail prayers are not unnecessarily adjourned and thus we hope and pray that HC takes a call in the matter when it is listed next."

Jain challenged the validity of the Delhi High Court's order of May 28 which adjourned his default bail plea to July 09, 2024 while issuing notice to the Enforcement Directorate.

He was arrested on May 30, 2022 by the Enforcement Directorate on the charge of laundering money through companies allegedly linked to him.

In May, 2023 the apex court granted interim bail to Jain for six weeks for spinal surgery. The apex court extended the interim bail by five weeks on July 24, 2023 after that the court had extended Jains interim bail several times.

On March 18, 2024, the Supreme Court had rejected an appeal by Jain against dismissal of his bail plea. The court had ordered him to surrender forthwith after cancelling his medical bail, holding that there was prima facie sufficient materials that he was guilty of offences in a money laundering case.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

mere-use-of-word-arbitration-does-not-create-valid-arbitration-agreement-sc
Trending Judiciary
Mere Use of Word “Arbitration” Does Not Create Valid Arbitration Agreement: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that mere use of the word “arbitration” in a contract clause doesn’t constitute a valid arbitration agreement without clear intent.

08 November, 2025 01:14 PM
sc-issues-notice-on-plea-seeking-one-third-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Plea Seeking One-Third Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils [Read Order]

Supreme Court issues notice on plea seeking one-third reservation for women in all State Bar Councils to ensure gender equality in legal governance.

08 November, 2025 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email