38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Rape Charges "Serious": SC Rejects Tarun Tejpal's Plea To Quash 2013 Sexual Assault Case

By LawStreet News Network      19 August, 2019 04:08 PM      0 Comments
Rape Charges

The Supreme Court today i.e., August 19, 2019, has quashed a plea filed by Tehelka magazine founder Tarun Tejpal who is accused in a sexual assault case of 2013. The apex court has asked a Goa court to finish the trial within six months.

A Bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra while hearing Tejpal's plea said that sexual assault is a very serious offence and morally abhorrent case and since the charges were framed six years back, there can be no further delay.

Refusing to give any relief to Tarun Tejpal, the Bench asked Goa's lower court to complete the trial preferably within six months.

Tarun Tejpal, the founder-editor of Tehelka, is accused of sexually assaulting a woman employee during an event in Goa in 2013, the ThinkFest organized by the newsmagazine.

The young woman has accused him of assaulting her inside an elevator of the five-star hotel where the event took place.

The allegations surfaced after a series of emails in which the woman complained to her seniors at Tehelka and Mr. Tejpal and the magazine's then Managing Editor Shoma Chaudhary responded, were leaked and published by media.

Mr. Tejpal stepped down as Tehelka Editor soon after, saying he was "recusing" himself for six months. He was arrested in November 2013. He has been out on bail since May 2014.

In a 2,684-page chargesheet filed before the Goa fast-track court, the police said Mr. Tejpal assaulted the woman twice and that there was enough evidence against him.

On the other hand, Mr. Tejpal has said that the allegations are false and part of "political vendetta" by the BJP government in Goa.

He had approached the Supreme Court to set aside the rape charges against him after the Bombay High Court in 2017 dismissed the same request.

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email