38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, August 21, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC stays bailable warrants against Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan in defamation case [Read Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      12 November, 2024 10:37 AM      0 Comments
SC stays bailable warrants against Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan in defamation case

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the execution of bailable warrant against Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan and two other BJP leaders, provided they participated effectively in a defamation case filed by Congress Rajya Sabha MP Vivek Tankha.

A bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and S V N Bhatti sought a response from Tankha, also a senior advocate on a plea of Chouhan and others.

Supreme Court Halts Bailable Warrant Against Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan in Defamation Case

Former MP Chief Minister Chouhan and others challenged the Madhya Pradesh High Court's October 25 order, which refused to quash the defamation case filed with regard to statements made on OBC reservation in local bodies.

"The execution of bailable warrants against the petitioners shall not be executed subject to their effective participation in the proceedings before the court in the case," the bench said.

Effective Participation Required: SC Grants Relief to Chouhan and BJP Leaders in Defamation Suit

Senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, appearing for Chouhan and others, said the purported statements mentioned in the complaint by Tankha were made on the floor of the house and were covered by Article 194 (2) of the Constitution.

Article 194 (2) states, "No member of the Legislature of a State shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in the Legislature or any committee thereof, and no person shall be so liable in respect of the publication by or under the authority of a House of such a Legislature of any report, paper, votes or proceedings."

The alleged defamatory statements respectively were made on December 22 2021 and December 25, 2021, in the backdrop of the Madhya Pradesh local bodies elections.

Jethmalani submitted it was unheard of that in a summons case, a bailable warrant was issued by the court, when the parties could appear through their counsel.

Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Shyam Divan appeared for the respondent.

On October 25, the High Court had refused to quash the defamation case lodged by Tankha against Chouhan, BJP state president V D Sharma and former minister Bhupendra Singh.

On January 20, 2024, a special court in Jabalpur registered the defamation case against the three BJP leaders under IPC Section 500, summoning them in court.

The petitioners submitted that a bare perusal of the alleged defamatory material filed by the complainant, even if taken on their face value, does not prima facie, make out any offence much less offence under Section 499 of Indian Panel Code as alleged by the respondent. 
 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

state-a-constitutional-employer-cant-use-financial-constraints-as-talisman
Trending Judiciary
State, a constitutional employer, can't use financial constraints as 'talisman' to deny lawful regularisation to workers: SC [Read Judgment]

SC says State can’t cite financial crunch to deny workers regularisation; fairness in public employment is constitutional obligation.

20 August, 2025 01:48 PM
himachal-prasesh-hc-quashes-disciplinary-action-against-security-guard
Trending Judiciary
Himachal Pradesh HC Quashes Disciplinary Action Against Security Guard At Chief Minister’s Residence [Read Order]

Himachal Pradesh HC quashes disciplinary action against constable over CM residence lapse, citing lack of evidence and violation of fairness.

20 August, 2025 03:05 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-plea-against-quashing-fir-in-case-of-suicide
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea against quashing FIR in case of suicide of then MP Mohan Delkar

SC dismisses plea against quashing of FIR in ex-MP Mohan Delkar suicide case; Bombay HC’s 2022 order stands, no interference by Supreme Court.

18 August, 2025 12:21 PM
no-automatic-arrest-on-rejection-of-anticipatory-bail-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
No Automatic Arrest on Rejection of Anticipatory Bail: Supreme Court [Read Order]

SC clarifies that rejection of anticipatory bail doesn’t mean automatic arrest; custody depends on investigation, conduct, and case facts.

18 August, 2025 12:27 PM
court-holds-surgeon-guilty-of-indulging-in-black-magic-during-hearing-sentenced-till-rising-of-court
Trending Judiciary
Court holds Surgeon guilty of indulging in black magic during hearing; sentenced till rising of court [Read Order]

Delhi court convicts surgeon for disrupting proceedings with ‘black magic’; sentenced till rising of court with ₹2,000 fine after apology.

18 August, 2025 12:40 PM
want-bravehearts-to-be-in-forces-sc-for-giving-insurance-cover-to-cadets-discharged-during-military-training
Trending Judiciary
'Want bravehearts to be in forces,' SC for giving insurance cover to cadets discharged during military training

SC seeks insurance cover, rehab and higher aid for cadets injured during military training, stressing need to support bravehearts joining armed forces.

18 August, 2025 04:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email