38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, December 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC stays Ktka HC order on contempt proceedings against HDK

By Harshvardhan Sharma      17 July, 2025 06:04 PM      0 Comments
SC stays Ktka HC order on contempt proceedings against HDK

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the Karnataka High Court, which impleaded Union Minister H D Kumaraswamy in a contempt proceedings.

A bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and Prasanna B Varale issued notice to NGO Samaj Parivartan Samudaya on a petition filed by former Karnataka Chief Minister and JD-S leader.

The court directed that the order of the Karnataka High Court impleading Kumaraswam as accused in a contempt case should be kept in abeyance.

The court also orally questioned the rationale behind continuing the contempt proceedings, especially in light of the closure of the Lokayukta inquiry.

After hearing submissions, the Court issued notice and sought a response from the NGO within four weeks.

Kumaraswamy was represented by senior advocate C Aryama Sundaram, along with advocates Balaji Srinivasan, Nishanth A V and Harsha Tripathi.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan appeared on caveat for Samaj Parivartana Samudaya.

The matter related to a long-standing dispute arising from a complaint filed in 2011 before the Karnataka Lokayukta regarding alleged encroachment in Kethaganahalli Village, Bidadi Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk.

In 2020, the NGO filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court seeking an inquiry into the alleged encroachment pursuant to the Lokayukta’s order.

The petition was disposed of by the High Court on January 14, 2020, based on the State’s assurance that it would conduct an inquiry.

Kumaraswamy, though arrayed as a party, was not issued notice in those proceedings.

Subsequently, the NGO initiated contempt proceedings before the High Court alleging non-compliance with January 14, 2020 order.

Although Kumaraswamy was initially made a party to the contempt proceedings, he was later deleted from the array of parties by the High Court itself.

On March 03, 2021, the Karnataka Lokayukta formally closed the complaint.

However, the High Court continued monitoring the matter through the contempt proceedings and directed enforcement of eviction measures. Pursuant to these directions, a notice was issued to Kumaraswamy by the Tahsildar, Ramanagara Taluk, initiating eviction proceedings—prompting him to learn of the pending contempt matter.

Aggrieved with the developments, Kumaraswamy approached the Supreme Court, the court then disposed of the petition, granting liberty to him to appear before the High Court and raise his concerns about being subjected to proceedings without a hearing.

Kumaraswamy filed an application before the High Court, highlighting the sequence of events. Nevertheless, on April 17, 2025, the High Court passed an order arraigning him as accused no. 3 in the contempt proceedings, despite his earlier deletion and lack of notice in the original writ petition.

This prompted Kumaraswamy to file the instant plea before the Supreme Court, which agreed to examine his plea.



Share this article:

About:

Advocate Harshvardhan Sharma, founder and Editor-in-Chief of LawStreet Journal, is an award-winning ...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM

TOP STORIES

scwla-hails-supreme-courts-historic-30-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils-a-landmark-leap-for-gender-parity-in-the-legal-profession
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Hails Supreme Court’s Historic 30% Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils: A Landmark Leap for Gender Parity in the Legal Profession [Read Press Release]

Supreme Court orders 30% reservation for women in State Bar Councils; SCWLA welcomes the landmark verdict as a major step toward gender equality in the legal profession.

09 December, 2025 04:45 PM
only-central-state-employees-fall-under-section-2e-gratuity-exclusion-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Only Central, State Employees Fall Under Section 2(e) Gratuity Exclusion: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules KSBC retired abkari workers are entitled to gratuity, holding that Section 2(e) exclusion applies only to government employees.

09 December, 2025 08:28 PM
civic-bodies-have-authority-to-revise-property-tax-rates-courts-cannot-substitute-judgment-on-policy-decisions-sc
Trending Judiciary
Civic Bodies Have Authority to Revise Property Tax Rates; Courts Cannot Substitute Judgment on Policy Decisions: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds municipal autonomy to revise property tax rates, ruling that courts cannot interfere in policy decisions absent arbitrariness or illegality.

09 December, 2025 08:35 PM
hostile-witness-testimony-cannot-be-rejected-in-toto-supreme-court-reiterates-settled-legal-position
Trending Judiciary
Hostile Witness Testimony Cannot Be Rejected in Toto: Supreme Court Reiterates Settled Legal Position [Read Judgment]

Hostile witness testimony cannot be rejected entirely, the Supreme Court held, reaffirming that credible portions supporting prosecution or defence must still be considered.

09 December, 2025 08:44 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email