38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC tells States, UTs to ensure immediate release of convicts on completion of jail term

By Jhanak Sharma      12 August, 2025 03:42 PM      0 Comments
SC tells States UTs to ensure immediate release of convicts on completion of jail term

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed all states and union territories to immediately release any convict who has served his or her jail term and if he or she is not wanted in any other case.

A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and K V Viswanathan expressed its displeasure over prisoners’ languishing in jail even after completing their sentence.

The court directed its registry to circulate the copy of the order to home secretaries of all states and UTs to ascertain whether any accused or convict has remained in jail beyond the period of sentence.

"If so, issue directions for release of such convicts if not wanted in any other cases. A similar copy shall be sent to member secretary National Legal Service Authorities for onward transmission to all member secretaries of state and UTs legal service authorities for communication of district legal service authorities in the states for the implementation of judgment," the court said.

The court's direction came, while ordering the release of Sukhdev Yadav alias Pehalwan in the 2002 Nitish Katara murder case.

The bench found that Yadav had completed his sentence of 20 years in March, this year, without remission, and he should have been released after he completed his sentence.

The apex court made it clear that there can't be any further incarceration of Yadav from March 9, 2025, onwards.

“In fact, on March 10, 2025, the appellant ought to have been released, as he completed his sentence," the bench said.

Yadav approached the court against an order passed by the Delhi High Court in November 2024, which had dismissed his petition for releasing him on furlough for three weeks.

The apex court granted three months furlough to Yadav. The apex court had noted that Yadav had undergone 20 years of uninterrupted incarceration without remission.

The apex court had on October 3, 2016, awarded Vikas Yadav, who is the son of Uttar Pradesh politician D P Yadav, 25-year jail term without any benefit of remission. He, along with his cousin Vishal and their hench man Sukhdev Pehalwan, was convicted for killing Nitish Katara, a young MBA, over an affair with his sister.

Sukhdev Yadav was given a 20-year jail term.

The accused had kidnapped Katara from a marriage party on the intervening night of February 16 and 17, 2002 and then killed him.

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-upholds-eds-provisional-attachment-orders-in-international-cricket-betting-racket
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds ED’s Provisional Attachment Orders in International Cricket Betting Racket [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds ED’s provisional attachment orders in a major international cricket betting and hawala case, dismissing all petitions under PMLA.

25 November, 2025 01:03 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-different-retirement-ages-for-coast-guard-officers
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Different Retirement Ages for Coast Guard Officers [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds different retirement ages for Coast Guard officers, ruling the distinction lawful and not comparable to CAPFs’ uniform superannuation age.

25 November, 2025 01:21 PM
sc-holds-defective-affidavit-in-ibc-is-curable-not-fatal-to-petition
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Defective Affidavit In IBC Is Curable, Not Fatal To Petition [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that a defective affidavit in a Section 7 IBC application is a curable irregularity, not grounds for rejection, and stresses mandatory notice requirements.

25 November, 2025 01:46 PM
police-cannot-label-sc-st-complaints-as-civil-disputes-fir-must-be-registered-immediately-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Label SC/ST Complaints as ‘Civil Disputes’, FIR Must Be Registered Immediately: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules police cannot treat SC/ST complaints as civil disputes and must register FIRs immediately under Section 18-A without preliminary enquiry.

25 November, 2025 01:58 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email