38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, August 07, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC to consider if Pankaj Bansal judgment on furnishing grounds of arrest to be applied retrospectively [Read Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      27 June, 2025 03:46 PM      0 Comments
SC to consider if Pankaj Bansal judgment on furnishing grounds of arrest to be applied retrospectively

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has decided to examine a plea by Karnataka government against the High Court's order, which held that the apex court's judgment in Pankaj Bansal Vs Union of India (2024) for furnishing grounds of arrest to the accused, would be applied retrospectively.

"We are of the opinion that the matter requires consideration," a bench of Justices K V Vishwanathan and N Kotiswar Singh said, after hearing senior advocate Sidharth Luthra and advocate D L Chidananda for the Karnataka government.

The counsel also pointed out in another case, the apex court had on April 22, 2025 reserved its judgment, to a question if in each and every case, even arising out of an offence under Indian Penal Code, would it be necessary to furnish grounds of arrest to an accused either before arrest or forthwith after it.

The court had then also decided to consider another question whether, even in exceptional cases, where on account of certain exigencies it will not be possible to furnish the grounds of arrest either before arrest or immediately after arrest, the arrest itself would be vitiated on the ground of non-compliance with the provisions of Section 50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

"The outcome of this judgment will have a bearing on finally deciding this matter," the bench opined.

Luthra also drew attention of the court to the fact that in a large number of cases, which are pending before the High Court, where it is likely that the impugned order herein would be cited as a precedent.

Due to the urgency involved in the matter, the bench fixed it for consideration on July 18. It issued notice to the opposite party, Hemanth Datta alias Hemantha alias Baby and another.

In its petition, state government challenged the final judgment of April 17, 2025 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, claiming it has erroneously held that law declared by this court by the judgment of October 03, 2023 in the case of Pankaj Bansal Vs Union of India (2024) will apply retrospectively to cases where arrest were made prior to the date of the verdict and that the said arrests can be challenged on the ground of non-service of grounds of arrest.

"The High Court has failed to take note of the declaration of law made in para 45 of the judgment in Pankaj Bansal case, wherein it is specifically stated that “it would be necessary, henceforth, that a copy of such written grounds of arrest is furnished to the arrested person as a matter of course and without exception”," the plea said.

The state government also contended the High Court's view was contrary the judgment of December 15, 2023 passed by the Supreme Court in Ram Kishor Arora Vs Enforcement Directorate, (2024), wherein the issue of retrospective or prospective application of law declared in Pankaj Bansal case was considered.

It has been held by this court that non-furnishing of grounds of arrest in writing till the date of pronouncement of judgment in Pankaj Bansal case could neither be held to be illegal nor the action of the officer concerned in not furnishing the same in writing could be faulted with, the state government's plea said.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-approves-tamil-nadus-with-you-stalin-scheme-slaps-rs-10-lakh-cost-on-aiadmk-mp
Trending Judiciary
SC approves Tamil Nadu's 'With You Stalin' scheme; slaps Rs 10 lakh cost on AIADMK MP

SC upholds Tamil Nadu’s ‘With You Stalin’ scheme, slams AIADMK MP with ₹10L fine for misuse of law to target DMK amid similar schemes nationwide.

06 August, 2025 03:12 PM
sc-asks-ec-to-file-response-to-plea-seeking-reasons-for-excluding-65-lakh-voters-in-bihars-sir
Trending Judiciary
SC asks EC to file response to plea seeking reasons for excluding 65 lakh voters in Bihar's SIR

SC seeks EC’s reply on plea alleging exclusion of 65 lakh voters in Bihar during electoral roll revision; hearing set for August 12.

06 August, 2025 03:16 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-to-first-consider-maintainability-of-review-against-2022-judgment-on-eds-powers-under-pmla
Trending Judiciary
SC to first consider maintainability of review against 2022 judgment on ED's powers under PMLA

SC to first decide if review pleas on ED powers under PMLA are maintainable; hearing on Karti Chidambaram’s plea set for August 6.

01 August, 2025 10:58 AM
sc-recalls-may-2-judgment-scrapping-jsw-steels-resolution-plan-for-bhushan-power-and-steel-ltd
Trending Business
SC recalls May 2 judgment scrapping JSW Steel's resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd

SC recalls its May 2 verdict cancelling JSW Steel’s ₹19,300 Cr resolution plan for Bhushan Power; matter to be heard afresh on August 7.

01 August, 2025 11:13 AM
electronic-communication-not-valid-mode-of-service-of-notice-under-section-35-bnss-sc
Trending Judiciary
Electronic communication not valid mode of service of notice under Section 35 BNSS: SC [Read Order]

SC holds WhatsApp or email not valid for notice under Section 35 BNSS due to arrest risk; personal service required to safeguard liberty.

01 August, 2025 11:25 AM
sc-quashes-criminal-case-against-actor-mohan-babu-son
Trending CelebStreet
SC quashes criminal case against Actor Mohan Babu, son for dharna during 2019 General Elections [Read Judgment]

SC quashes case against Mohan Babu, son for 2019 dharna; says it was peaceful protest, no offence made out under electoral or criminal laws.

01 August, 2025 02:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email