38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 07, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

"No one is stopping you from going to office. Needless to say, lawyers' offices are expemted" : SC to Delhi Bar Association in petition seeking interstate movement

By Ghazal Bhootra      17 May, 2020 12:53 PM      0 Comments
SC Delhi Bar Association Interstate movement

The Delhi Bar Council filed an appeal before the High Court of Delhi seeking the courts decision on permitting lawyers to move in and out of Delhi to present before courts and their respective offices, in line with allowing interstate movement of lawyers. 

The petitioner, Bar Council of Delhis Chairman, KC Mittal, endeavored to challenge the judgments of the State of Haryana and the State of Uttar Pradesh to seal the borders they possess with National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT) which had rendered it almost impossible for lawyers living in National Capital Region (NCR) to travel to the courts as well as their places of work situated in Delhi.

It was brought to notice that the latest Ministry of Home Affairs guidelines, which were released on 8th May 2020, allowed private offices to work with a limited number of employees and staff. The petition also stated that the Government of Delhi, on 8th May 2020 made a statement clarifying that advocates and chartered accountants will not be thwarted from going to and working from their offices. 

The petitioner argued that if people living in Delhi can go and attend their offices, then why the lawyers residing in the NCR region should be stopped from doing the same.

It stated:

"When residents of Delhi are permitted to access their offices, why should lawyers living in the NCR region be deprived of the same. The non-permitting of advocates to cross the border by the officials and authorities at the border of respondents no. 2 (UP government) and 3 (Haryana government) are in violation of fundamental rights under Article 19 (1)(d) (right to freedom of movement) and 301 (freedom of trade and commerce) of the Constitution and their action is highly arbitrary and illegal."

It was also argued in furtherance to the earlier arguments that lawyers living in various parts of UP and Haryana cannot be disallowed from moving in and out of Delhi to work from their offices and perform their official duties.

In furtherance to the arguments put forth, the petition sought an order to be issued to the respondents to permit the movement of Lawyers, in and out of Delhi on presenting their Bar Council identity cards.

The said petition was filed by Advocate Amit Prakash Sahni.

 

Latest Development: 

In the said petition seeking inter-state movement of lawyers during lockdown measures, the Supreme Court of India stated: No one is stopping you from going to office. Needless to say, lawyers offices are exempted (Source: Twitter) 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

bombay-hc-rules-adopted-child-with-unknown-parentage-inherits-caste-of-adoptive-parents
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Rules Adopted Child With Unknown Parentage Inherits Caste of Adoptive Parents [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court held that an adopted child with unknown parentage acquires the caste of adoptive parents and is entitled to caste validity.

02 February, 2026 11:11 AM
ugc-regulations-on-vice-chancellor-selection-binding-state-law-deviation-illegal-sc
Trending Judiciary
UGC Regulations on Vice-Chancellor Selection Binding; State Law Deviation Illegal: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds UGC Regulations on Vice-Chancellor selection binding, strikes down state law deviation, but allows incumbent to complete tenure under Article 142.

02 February, 2026 12:16 PM
bombay-hc-holds-section-9-cannot-be-used-to-fasten-liability-on-non-signatory-once-foreign-award-is-held-unenforceable
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Section 9 Cannot Be Used to Fasten Liability on Non-Signatory Once Foreign Award Is Held Unenforceable [Read Judgment]

Bombay HC holds Section 9 cannot fasten liability on a non-signatory once a foreign arbitral award is held unenforceable against it.

02 February, 2026 12:21 PM
madras-hc-bans-construction-at-heritage-temples-across-tamil-nadu-until-heritage-commission-is-formed
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bans Construction at Heritage Temples Across Tamil Nadu Until Heritage Commission Is Formed [Read Order]

Madras High Court bans civil construction at heritage temples across Tamil Nadu until the State Heritage Commission is constituted and becomes functional.

02 February, 2026 12:38 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email