38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, December 20, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

"No one is stopping you from going to office. Needless to say, lawyers' offices are expemted" : SC to Delhi Bar Association in petition seeking interstate movement

By Ghazal Bhootra      17 May, 2020 12:53 PM      0 Comments
SC Delhi Bar Association Interstate movement

The Delhi Bar Council filed an appeal before the High Court of Delhi seeking the courts decision on permitting lawyers to move in and out of Delhi to present before courts and their respective offices, in line with allowing interstate movement of lawyers. 

The petitioner, Bar Council of Delhis Chairman, KC Mittal, endeavored to challenge the judgments of the State of Haryana and the State of Uttar Pradesh to seal the borders they possess with National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT) which had rendered it almost impossible for lawyers living in National Capital Region (NCR) to travel to the courts as well as their places of work situated in Delhi.

It was brought to notice that the latest Ministry of Home Affairs guidelines, which were released on 8th May 2020, allowed private offices to work with a limited number of employees and staff. The petition also stated that the Government of Delhi, on 8th May 2020 made a statement clarifying that advocates and chartered accountants will not be thwarted from going to and working from their offices. 

The petitioner argued that if people living in Delhi can go and attend their offices, then why the lawyers residing in the NCR region should be stopped from doing the same.

It stated:

"When residents of Delhi are permitted to access their offices, why should lawyers living in the NCR region be deprived of the same. The non-permitting of advocates to cross the border by the officials and authorities at the border of respondents no. 2 (UP government) and 3 (Haryana government) are in violation of fundamental rights under Article 19 (1)(d) (right to freedom of movement) and 301 (freedom of trade and commerce) of the Constitution and their action is highly arbitrary and illegal."

It was also argued in furtherance to the earlier arguments that lawyers living in various parts of UP and Haryana cannot be disallowed from moving in and out of Delhi to work from their offices and perform their official duties.

In furtherance to the arguments put forth, the petition sought an order to be issued to the respondents to permit the movement of Lawyers, in and out of Delhi on presenting their Bar Council identity cards.

The said petition was filed by Advocate Amit Prakash Sahni.

 

Latest Development: 

In the said petition seeking inter-state movement of lawyers during lockdown measures, the Supreme Court of India stated: No one is stopping you from going to office. Needless to say, lawyers offices are exempted (Source: Twitter) 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

fight-4-justice-awards-2025-live4freedom-and-dhcba-to-honour-landmark-legal-struggles
Trending Events & Opportunity
Fight 4 Justice Awards 2025: Live4Freedom and DHCBA to Honour Landmark Legal Struggles

Fight 4 Justice Awards 2025 on Dec 20: Justice N. Kotiswar Singh as Chief Guest; Live4Freedom and DHCBA honour landmark legal struggles.

20 December, 2025 04:30 PM

TOP STORIES

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM
cash-debt-exceeding-20000-does-not-invalidate-cheque-dishonour-cases-under-section-138-of-the-ni-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Cash Debt Exceeding ₹20,000 Does Not Invalidate Cheque Dishonour Cases Under Section 138 of the NI Act: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that cash loans above ₹20,000 do not invalidate cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the NI Act despite I-T Act violations.

14 December, 2025 02:23 AM
sc-upholds-10-year-sentence-for-woman-in-commercial-quantity-ganja-case-rejects-pleas-based-on-sampling-irregularities
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds 10-Year Sentence for Woman in Commercial Quantity Ganja Case, Rejects Pleas Based on Sampling Irregularities [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds 10-year sentence under NDPS Act in commercial ganja case, ruling that sampling irregularities alone do not vitiate prosecution.

14 December, 2025 02:30 AM
sc-upholds-bail-in-2010-jnaneswari-express-derailment-case-issues-directions-on-speedy-trials-under-uapa
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Bail in 2010 Jnaneswari Express Derailment Case, Issues Directions on Speedy Trials Under UAPA [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds bail in the 2010 Jnaneswari Express derailment case while issuing sweeping directions to ensure speedy trials in UAPA cases.

14 December, 2025 02:39 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email