38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, September 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Upholds Allahabad HC Guidelines on Safeguards Against Misuse of Section 498A IPC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      24 July, 2025 04:14 PM      0 Comments
SC Upholds Allahabad HC Guidelines on Safeguards Against Misuse of Section 498A IPC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has affirmed the Allahabad High Court's June 13, 2022 judgment, which directed for setting up a family welfare committees in each district and mandatory two months cooling off period as safeguards against misuse of Section 498A, IPC.

A bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih said the guidelines framed by the High Court in its judgment would remain in effect and should be implemented by the appropriate authorities.

The High Court had stated no arrest or police action to nab the named accused persons would be made in matrimonial disputes, after lodging of the FIR or complaints without concluding the "cooling-period" of two months from the lodging of the FIR or the complaint.

It had also said during this period, the matter would be immediately referred to Family Welfare Committe in the each district. Only those cases would be transmitted to FWC in which Section 498-A IPC along with, no injury 307 and other sections of the IPC in which the imprisonment is less than 10 years. Every district shall have at least one or more FWC (depending upon the geographical size and population of that district constituted under the District Legal Aid Services Authority) comprising of at least three members.

The July 22 judgment also directed a woman IPS officer and her parents to publish an unconditional apology in a renowned English and Hindi daily, for causing her husband and his father to remain in jail for over 100 days and making the entire family suffer physical and mental trauma and harassment.

The apology was directed to be circulated on social media platform Facebook, Instagram, YouTube etc.

Dealing with a transfer petitions and other cases by the woman and her husband, the court invoked power under Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve the marriage between the parties, who were living separately since 2018.

"As a result of the cases filed by the wife, the husband remained in jail for a period of 109 days and his father for 103 days and the entire family suffered physical and mental trauma and harassment. What they have suffered cannot be resituated or compensated in any manner. The woman and her parents shall tender an unconditional apology to the husband and his family members within three days," the bench ordered.

The court said, the apology is made to bring about amicable closure to the protracted legal battle and associated emotional and mental stress, and not be construed as an admission of liability and would have no bearing on the legal rights, obligations, or consequences under the law.

The bench directed the woman officer never to use her position and power as an IPS officer or any other future position, power of her colleagues or superiors or other acquaintances anywhere in the country, against the husband, his family members and relatives.

The marriage of the woman and her husband was solemnised in 2015 and a daughter was born to them next year. However, they started living separately since 2018 due to matrimonial differences.

Thereafter a total of 15 separate cases were filed against her husband and family members, who on their part also filed 10 cases against the woman and her family members. Five other cases were against each other.

After hearing senior advocate Sidharth Luthra for the woman and senior advocate Vikas Singh for the husband and his family members, the court quashed all cases, "to bring an end to the protracted legal battle between the parties and to secure complete justice".

The court allowed the wife, who claimed no maintenance, to keep the custody of the girl child and granted the husband and his family visitation rights. It said woman would have no claim over any moveable and immoveable property owned and possessed by the husband and his family members.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-notice-to-ed-on-plea-by-journalist-in-money-laundering-case
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED on plea by journalist in money laundering case

SC issues notice to Gujarat govt & ED on plea of ex-‘The Hindu’ journalist Mahesh Langa seeking bail in money laundering case linked to alleged fraud.

08 September, 2025 02:37 PM
absence-of-cheque-bank-transfer-or-receipt-wont-always-negate-cash-transaction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Absence of cheque, bank transfer or receipt won't always negate cash transaction: SC [Read Order]

Absence of cheque, transfer or receipt doesn’t negate cash deal; promissory note & oral statement can establish enforceable debt: SC

08 September, 2025 02:43 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-rejects-plea-upholds-3500-aibe-exam-fee-by-bci-as-not-unconstitutional
Trending Judiciary
SC Rejects Plea, Upholds ₹3,500 AIBE Exam Fee by BCI as Not Unconstitutional

SC dismisses plea against Rs 3,500 AIBE fee, upholding Bar Council of India’s right to charge for exam expenses, ruling fee not unconstitutional.

03 September, 2025 11:16 AM
hc-dismisses-plea-for-bail-by-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-case-of-conspiracy-to-delhi-riots
Trending Judiciary
HC dismisses plea for bail by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in case of conspiracy to Delhi riots [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC dismisses bail pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 riots conspiracy case, citing strong evidence and grave role in instigating violence.

03 September, 2025 12:20 PM
elgar-parishad-case-sc-defers-bail-plea-of-accused-lawyer-surendra-gadling-to-sep-17
Trending Judiciary
Elgar Parishad Case: SC Defers Bail Plea of Accused Lawyer Surendra Gadling to Sep 17

SC defers Surendra Gadling’s bail plea in Elgar Parishad case to Sep 17; advocate jailed over 6 years under UAPA charges without trial.

03 September, 2025 06:31 PM
unacceptable-sc-says-everyone-cant-come-to-it-just-due-to-physical-proximity
Trending Judiciary
'Unacceptable,' SC says everyone can't come to it just due to physical proximity

SC: Not acceptable to approach top court just due to proximity; raps Sukesh Chandrashekar’s wife Leena Paulose over bail plea hearing.

03 September, 2025 08:03 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email