38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, September 12, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC upholds bail to UAPA accused arrested for attending 'Jihadi' meetings in Bengaluru [Read Judgment]

By Harshvardhan Sharma      21 August, 2025 03:48 PM      0 Comments
SC upholds bail to UAPA accused arrested for attending Jihadi meetings in Bengaluru

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has upheld the Karnataka High Court's April 21, 2022 order, which granted bail to a man, arrested initially by the Bengaluru police under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for participating in ''Jihadi'' meetings of organisation, AL Hind.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and K V Vishwanathan dismissed the Union government's appeal against the grant of bail to accused Saleem Khan.

The court, however, affirmed the denial of bail to another accused Zaid Khan.

In its judgment, the bench said, "The Karnataka High Court has dealt with all the aspects in great detail. The reasons given for grant of bail to Saleem Khan, and the reasons given for refusal to grant bail to accused Mohd Zaid in our considered opinion is fully justified and reasonable."

In case of Saleem Khan, the High Court noticed that the allegations found in the charge-sheet related to his connections with an organisation by the name of AL Hind, which admittedly is not a banned organisation under the schedule to UAPA, the bench noted.

Therefore, to say that he was attending meetings of the said organisation, AL-Hind and others would not amount to any prima facie offence, the bench cited the HC's order.

The court also noted the HC's order was passed almost 3-1/2 years ago.

"As such, it may not be just and proper to interfere with the same at this stage. Further, it is admitted position at the bar that the charges have not been framed so far and trial has not commenced even though the accused have been in custody for 5-1/2 years,'' the bench said.

With regard to Zaid, the bench pointed out, the High Court has found his involvement with banned terrorist organisations, his active role in operating dark web and assisting the members of the banned terrorist organisations.

"The reasons given by the High Court are based upon the material collected during investigation and as reflected in the charge-sheet. The High Court further noticed the involvement of Zaid in another case under UAPA. Although, we may record here that in the said case arising from State of Tamil Nadu, he has been granted bail by the Madras High Court. We, therefore, find that the High Court was justified in not granting bail to him,'' the bench said.

The court also directed the trial court to expedite the proceedings and conclude it within a period of two years as more than 100 witnesses are to be examined by the prosecution.  

"The fact remains that the trial has not commenced despite lapse of 5-1/2 years. Accused cannot be allowed to languish in jail without being given a fair and speedy trial,'' the bench said.

A total of 17 accused were named in the FIR, registered by Suddanguntepalaya Police Station on January 10, 2020. The case was later referred to the National Investigating Agency, which re-registered the case on Janaury 22, 2020.

Saleem Khan was arrested on Janaury 20, 2020 and Zaid Khan on March 09, 2020. The charge sheet was filed on July 13, 2020.

[Read Judgment] 

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Advocate Harshvardhan Sharma, founder and Editor-in-Chief of LawStreet Journal, is an award-winning ...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-disapproves-kerala-hc-directly-entertaining-pre-arrest-bails
Trending Judiciary
SC disapproves Kerala HC directly entertaining pre arrest bails [Read Order]

SC slams Kerala HC practice of directly entertaining anticipatory bail pleas, says litigants must first approach Sessions Court unless in exceptional cases.

11 September, 2025 01:58 PM
sc-quashes-cheque-dishonour-complaint-filed-5-days-late-rules-30-day-limit-under-ni-act-is-mandatory
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes Cheque Dishonour Complaint Filed 5 Days Late, Rules 30-Day Limit Under NI Act is Mandatory [Read Order]

SC quashes cheque dishonour complaint filed 5 days late, rules 30-day limit under NI Act is mandatory and delay needs proper condonation process.

11 September, 2025 02:32 PM

TOP STORIES

wife-living-in-adultery-not-entitled-to-maintenance-rules-delhi-court
Trending Judiciary
Wife Living In Adultery Not Entitled To Maintenance, Rules Delhi Court

Delhi court denies maintenance to woman under Section 125 CrPC, ruling that a wife proven to be living in adultery is disqualified from claiming support.

06 September, 2025 06:32 PM
sc-dissolves-marriage-faced-deadlock-over-1951-model-antique-hand-made-classic-rolls-royce-car
Trending Judiciary
SC dissolves marriage faced deadlock over 1951 model antique hand-made classic Rolls Royce car [Read Order]

SC dissolves marriage invoking Article 142 after dispute over 1951 Rolls Royce; man agrees to pay ₹2.25 cr in mediated settlement.

06 September, 2025 06:44 PM
sc-notice-to-ed-on-plea-by-journalist-in-money-laundering-case
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED on plea by journalist in money laundering case

SC issues notice to Gujarat govt & ED on plea of ex-‘The Hindu’ journalist Mahesh Langa seeking bail in money laundering case linked to alleged fraud.

08 September, 2025 02:37 PM
absence-of-cheque-bank-transfer-or-receipt-wont-always-negate-cash-transaction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Absence of cheque, bank transfer or receipt won't always negate cash transaction: SC [Read Order]

Absence of cheque, transfer or receipt doesn’t negate cash deal; promissory note & oral statement can establish enforceable debt: SC

08 September, 2025 02:43 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email