38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, August 18, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC upholds HC's order rejecting claims by KAL Airways, Maran for Rs 1,323 Cr [Read Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      24 July, 2025 02:22 PM      0 Comments
SC upholds HCs order rejecting claims by KAL Airways Maran for Rs 1323 Cr

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has approved the Delhi High Court's order, which dismissed KAL Airways and its owner Kalanithi Maran's claim for Rs 1,323 Crore damages against cash-strapped SpiceJet in connection with a long-standing share transfer dispute.

A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar dismissed the appeals by KAL Airways and Maran.

The bench said the court was not inclined to interfere in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution.

“We find that on the basis of the material on record, the inference drawn by the division bench while refusing to condone the delay cannot be brushed away or that the conclusions drawn were without any basis,” the bench said.

On May 26, the High Court's division bench had criticised KAL and Maran for the delay in filing their appeals, suppressing material facts related to their pending applications and for unjustifiably delaying the proceedings.

The High Court had then observed that Maran, a former promoter of SpiceJet, had engaged in a "calculated gamble" by delaying the filing and re-filing of their appeals. "The delay in refiling is completely lacking in bona fides and represents a gamble by the unsuccessful litigant (KAL Airways) keeping all, including the successful litigant (SpiceJet), in the dark," the HC had said.

Considering the challenge to the HC's decision, the court said, “While arriving at this conclusion, the division bench was alive to the fact that the approach of the court while dealing with applications for condonation of delay in refiling, was ordinarily to be expansive.”

The High Court had also noted KAL and Maran’s conduct to be lacking in bona fides, amounting to “fence sitting” and deliberate concealment.

“The case presents a classic example of fence sitting, keeping, in the process, the respondents (Spicejet), the division bench of this court, as well as the Supreme Court, completely in the dark regarding the filing of the present FAOs, and of their languishing under objections,” the High Court had said.

In February 2015, Maran and KAL Airways transferred their entire 58.46% stake in the airline to SpiceJet chairman Ajay Singh. In 2017, Maran and KAL Airways approached the High Court demanding that 180 million warrants redeemable as equity shares be transferred to them. The court had July 29, 2016 asked both the parties to settle the share transfer dispute under arbitration.

On July 20, 2018, the arbitral tribunal had rejected Maran’s claim of damages of Rs 1,323 crore for not issuing warrants to him and KAL Airways but awarded him a refund of Rs 579 crore with interest.

Both the parties challenged the arbitral award and the petitions were dismissed by a single judge of the Delhi High Court in July 2023.

SpiceJet and its chairman Ajay Singh promptly appealed against the dismissal within the statutory 60-day period. Their appeals were heard and in May last year, the division bench found merit in SpiceJet’s contentions and remanded the matter back to the single judge for fresh consideration.

Subsequently, KAL Airways and Maran appealed to the single-judge bench seeking the same amount in damages, which was also rejected. The appeals were found to have been filed after 55 days of delay, which also failed to cure procedural defects for another 226 days.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM
sc-notice-to-centre-on-pil-for-introducing-creamy-layers-among-sc-sts-for-reservation
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to Centre on PIL for introducing creamy layers among SC/STs for reservation

SC issues notice to Centre on PIL seeking creamy layer for SC/ST quotas to ensure reservation benefits reach poorest in these communities.

12 August, 2025 12:41 PM
madhya-pradesh-hc-extols-woman-as-ideal-indian-wife-for-staying-with-in-laws
Trending Judiciary
Madhya Pradesh HC Extols Woman As ‘IDEAL INDIAN WIFE’ For Staying With In-Laws Despite Husband’s Desertion [Read Order]

MP HC hails woman as ‘ideal Indian wife’ for living with in-laws 19 years after husband’s desertion, dismisses his divorce plea.

12 August, 2025 12:49 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email