38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Wishes Diwali In Its Own Style, Refuses Complete Ban On Sale Of Firecrackers, Allows Conditional Sale Ahead Of Diwali [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      23 October, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SC Wishes Diwali In Its Own Style, Refuses Complete Ban On Sale Of Firecrackers, Allows Conditional Sale Ahead Of Diwali [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court today (October 23, 2018) in the case of Arjun Gopal and Others v. Union of India and Others, has ruled against imposing a complete ban on the sale of firecrackers and said that only less polluting green crackers can be sold, that too only through licensed traders.

A Bench comprising of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan also banned the online sale of firecrackers, restraining e-commerce websites such as Flipkart and Amazon from carrying out its sale.

The Court also set the duration for the bursting of crackers. On the day of Diwali and other religious festivals, it will be between 8 PM and 10 PM. On Christmas Eve and New Year, it will be allowed only between 11.45 PM and 12.45 AM.

Earlier, on August 28, 2018, the court had reserved its verdict on the PILs filed by kid petitioners- Arjun Gopal, Aarav Bhandari and Zoya Rao Bhasin, all aged between three and four years.

The PIL was filed seeking a complete ban on sale, purchase and transportation of crackers.

The court had earlier observed that there was a need to strike a balance between the right to the health of citizens and the right to carry on the trade of firecracker manufacturers.

The Centre had opposed a complete ban on firecrackers and suggested certain conditions could be imposed on the manufactures and sale of high-decibel firecrackers instead.

Further, firecracker manufacturers also challenged the ban, saying it would affect their livelihood. According to them, firecrackers alone could not be held as the sole reason for pollution during Diwali, and an entire industry should not be shut down.

They contended that pollution had reached alarming levels, not due to the bursting of firecrackers alone, but also other factors such as vehicular pollution, construction dust and stubble burning.

On August 1, 2018, hearing the matter Justice Sikri had said that we know in each household, the children are affected. 28 to 30 percent of children we know suffer from ailments like asthma and bronchitis owing to the harmful effects of smoke. But do we need a complete ban and control or regulate the sale for a minimal effect, that is what we have to decide.

The apex court had on October 9, 2017, just before Diwali suspended the sale of firecrackers in Delhi and NCR till November 1, 2017, in a bid to test whether the festival without firecrackers will have a positive effect on the health of citizens and a steadily deteriorating air quality. It was to test itself to find out whether there would be a positive effect of the ban on air quality.

Mr. Sankaranarayanan, counsel for the petitioners, had pointed out that in three previous orders, the court had recorded that fireworks cause pollution and that the PM 2.5 levels spike during Diwali causes irreversible damage to the public, particularly to children and the aged.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email