38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Section 354A of IPC cannot be applied to prosecute women: Calcutta HC [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      29 July, 2024 04:28 PM      0 Comments
Section 354A of IPC cannot be applied to prosecute women: Calcutta HC

West Bengal: The Calcutta High Court has delivered a significant order quashing criminal proceedings against a woman accused under Section 354A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which deals with sexual harassment.

In an order passed on July 26, 2024, Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta held that Section 354A of the IPC cannot be applied to prosecute women, as the provision specifically uses the term “a man” in describing the offender.

The court noted that the petitioner, Susmita Pandit, had been charged under Sections 354A, 506, and 34 of the IPC in connection with Netaji Nagar Police Station Case No. 312 of 2018. She had filed a criminal revision application seeking the quashing of the proceedings.

Expressing its view on the applicability of Section 354A to women accused, the court stated: “From a bare perusal of this Section, it would be evident that Section 354A IPC can only apply to a male accused. The section opens up with the term ‘a man’.”

Also Read: Offences Under Section 354D Ipc And Section 506 Ipc Are Personal To Parties: Rules Supreme Court

The court further observed that “Section 354A itself is very clear, starting with ‘a man’ in all sub-sections (1), (2), and (3). Accordingly, a woman cannot be said to have committed an offence under Section 354A of the IPC. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner has rightly submitted that the present petitioner cannot be prosecuted for the alleged commission of an offence punishable under Section 354A of the IPC.”

Referring to previous judgments on the interpretation of penal statutes, including Supreme Court decisions, the court held that criminal laws must be strictly construed and cannot be extended beyond their fair and ordinary meaning.

The court also found that there were no specific allegations against the petitioner in the FIR or witness statements to justify charges under Sections 354A, 506, or 34 of the IPC.

In conclusion, the court quashed the proceedings against the petitioner, stating: “Accordingly, the proceedings in connection with Netaji Nagar Police Station Case No. 312 of 2018 dated 15th September 2018, under Sections 354A, 506, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, corresponding to ACGR No. 4463/2018 against the present petitioner, are hereby quashed.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Birbhum Massacre: NHRC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance, Directs State Gov To Submit Detailed Report Within 4 Weeks Birbhum Massacre: NHRC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance, Directs State Gov To Submit Detailed Report Within 4 Weeks

According to reports, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday met the families of the victims and announced Rs 2 lakh compensation for rebuilding the scorched homes. Promising jobs to ten families affected by the violence, Banerjee added that she would ensure "speedy justice".

Supreme Court Rejects West Bengal's Plea Against CBI Probe in Linked Municipality and Teachers' Recruitment Scam Supreme Court Rejects West Bengal's Plea Against CBI Probe in Linked Municipality and Teachers' Recruitment Scam

Supreme Court dismisses West Bengal's plea against CBI probe into municipality recruitment scam linked with teachers' recruitment irregularities. Abhishek Banerjee, TMC MP, faces setback as court refuses interference.

Calcutta High Court conducts late-evening hearing, orders release of lawyer arrested inside court [Read Order] Calcutta High Court conducts late-evening hearing, orders release of lawyer arrested inside court [Read Order]

After holding a late-evening hearing due to unprecedented events, a division bench of the Calcutta High Court stayed an order which directed a lawyers arrest inside the court on charges of contempt of court.

Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [Jan 1 - Jan 6] Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [Jan 1 - Jan 6]

A weekly round-up of the top stories from the Supreme Court of India and High Courts across the country summed up in a 3-minute read.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email