38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

[Breaking] Tehelka Founder-Editor Acquitted in Sexual Assault Case

By Celin Sunil      21 May, 2021 02:53 PM      0 Comments
Sexual Assault Case Tarun Tejpal Tehelka

An Additional Sessions Court on Friday, May 21, 2021, acquitted Tehelka founder-editor, Tarun Tejpal for allegedly raping his colleague in a hotel in Goa. The judgement was pronounced by Additional Sessions Judge Kshama Joshi

In a statement issued shortly after his acquittal, Tejpal thanked a host of lawyers who represented him in the case. These include Pramod Dubey, Aamir Khan, Ankur Chawla, Amit Desai, Kapil Sibal, Salman Khurshid, Aman Lekhi, Sandeep Kapoor, Raian Karanjawala, and Shrikant Shivade. 

He also paid tribute to Advocate Rajeev Gomes, who passed away from COVID-19 last week. Tejpal added that in November 2013, he was falsely accused of sexual assault by a colleague and now the trial court of additional sessions judge in Goa has acquitted him.

The case has witnessed many turns and twists in the past few years. In November, 2013, Tejpal was accused of sexually assaulting a junior colleague during an event organized by Tehelka at a starred hotel in Goa. 

The Goa Police subsequently registered a First Information Report (FIR) against Tejpal for various offences. Tejpal has been charged for offences under Sections 354, (assaulting or using criminal force on a woman with an intent to outrage her modesty), 354-A (outraging modesty), 341 (wrongful restraint), 342 (wrong confinement), 376 (rape), 376(2) (f) (person in position of trust or authority over women, committing rape of such women) and 376(2)(k) (rape of a woman by a person being in position of control or dominance over the woman). 

He was arrested in November, 2013 and later released on bail in July, 2014. The trial against Tejpal commenced in 2017. In the meanwhile, on December 20, 2017, he had moved the Bombay High Court for quashing the case against him, claiming that the charges were fabricated. The High Court had dismissed the plea after which he appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court also refused to interfere and rejected his petition on August 19, 2019.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

telangana-hc-cannot-seek-extension-beyond-45-day-limit-to-file-written-version-in-consumer-cases
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC: Cannot Seek Extension Beyond 45-Day Limit to File Written Version in Consumer Cases [Read Order]

Telangana High Court rules written versions in consumer cases cannot be filed beyond the mandatory 45-day limit under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

02 January, 2026 07:13 PM
preventive-detention-cannot-be-used-to-silence-dissenting-voices-of-journalists-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Preventive Detention Cannot Be Used to Silence Dissenting Voices of Journalists: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court warns against misuse of preventive detention to silence journalists, calls it a threat to free speech and liberty.

02 January, 2026 08:04 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-earlier-aravalli-definition-judgment-lists-matter-before-vacation-bench-on-december-29
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Earlier Aravalli Definition Judgment; Lists Matter Before Vacation Bench on December 29

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Aravalli definition issue, lists matter before Vacation Bench on Dec 29, 2025, amid environmental concerns.

28 December, 2025 05:08 PM
bombay-hc-upholds-b-summary-report-dismissing-plea-to-reopen-sexual-assault-case-against-sajjan-jindal
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Upholds B-Summary Report, Dismissing Plea to Reopen Sexual Assault Case Against Sajjan Jindal [Read Order]

Bombay High Court upholds B-summary report, dismisses plea to reopen sexual assault FIR against Sajjan Jindal, citing delay, consent, and lack of merit.

29 December, 2025 05:04 PM
calcutta-hc-holds-scst-act-provisions-not-applicable-to-caste-based-abuses-hurled-over-telephone-holds-conversation-not-in-public-view
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Holds SC/ST Act Provisions Not Applicable To Caste-Based Abuses Hurled Over Telephone, Holds Conversation Not In Public View

Calcutta High Court rules SC/ST Act not applicable to caste-based abuses over telephone, holding such conversations are not in public view.

29 December, 2025 05:13 PM
bombay-hc-holds-padma-awards-cannot-be-used-as-prefix-or-suffix-to-awardees-names
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Padma Awards Cannot Be Used as Prefix or Suffix to Awardees’ Names [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rules Padma awardees cannot use Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan or Bharat Ratna as prefixes or suffixes to their names under Article 18.

29 December, 2025 05:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email