38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Six ex-civil servants move SC seeking judicial inquiry into Centers gross Mismanagement of the pandemic and lockdown [READ PETITION]

By LawStreet News Network      24 July, 2020 01:28 PM      0 Comments
Six excivil servants move SC pandemic lockdown

A plea filed by six retired bureaucrats through Adv. Prashant Bhushan has requested for a commission (formed under Commissions of inquiry act 1952) to initiate an inquiry into the grave mismanagement of Covid19 in India. The petition has been filed by six retired bureaucrats through Adv. Prashant Bhushan.

It was stated in the petition that the he importance of the inquiry resides in the fact that the Respondent has stalled an inquiry by the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC) into the Respondents response to the pandemic. 

Key points of the petition are as follows:

  1. Due to the response of the Respondent to this pandemic, there has been the deleterious impact on the lives and citizens which is a definite matter of public importance and warrants the appointment of Commission under section 3 of the said act;
  2. The need for the inquiry as Respondent failed to undertake and effective measures for containing the transmission of disease within India despite Being notified by WHO in January 2020. Failed to adhere to the obligations under disaster management act and drawing National Plan under section 11 or  issuing guidelines for providing minimum standards of relief to vulnerable sections of society under Section 12;
  3. Respondent ignored the advice of National Taskforce who are experts in public health and epidemiology, prior to the imposition of nationwide lockdown;
  4. Respondent did not make timely provisions for the repercussions of the lockdown i.e. loss of jobs, destruction of livelihood, starvation, etc;
  5. Respondent has led to severe infraction of fundamental rights of people, as there was no effective screening or surveillance on international passenger or no such public awareness campaign in January. Also Respondent displayed lethargy and delay in ensuring adequate supplies of PPE kit.
  6. Respondent did not make any arrangements for migrant workers for coming back to their home town and people had to walk on roads for kilometers which led to the spread of the virus at unaffected districts. Many of them perished while walking under the burning sun which led to starvation and exhaustion, which held to be part of the right to life under article 21 of the constitution 
  7. Merely 4 hours prior announcement of nationwide lockdown led to the panic situation among citizens, around 6 crore people lost their jobs also most of their livelihood have been abruptly disturbed;
  8. WHO issued guidelines on 27/2/2020 to countries for ramping up their production of PPEs to meet the global demand, despite this severe paucity of PPEs that took place at a critical time and them on 24th March Respondent informed domestic PPE manufacturers about the specification and quantities of PPEs that would be required. This exhibited an inexplicable delay in scaling up the procurements of PPEs, as health care workers such as doctors, nurses, and other medical staff are at higher risk of contracting the virus and therefore these workers had to give treatment to the covid19 patients without PPE kits putting themselves at immense risk.

The plea demanded independent inquiry by the commission, headed by the retired SC judge along with experts of public health, epidemiology, medical science, law, and social sciences.

 

[READ PETITION] 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

pil-in-supreme-court-seeks-removal-of-up-ips-officer-ajay-pal-sharma-as-election-observer-in-west-bengal-polls
Trending Judiciary
PIL in Supreme Court Seeks Removal of UP IPS Officer Ajay Pal Sharma as Election Observer in West Bengal Polls

PIL in Supreme Court challenges appointment of UP IPS officer Ajay Pal Sharma as poll observer in West Bengal, alleging bias and violation of RP Act norms.

30 April, 2026 01:12 PM
bombay-hc-modifies-2046-order-in-defamation-suit-references-to-plaintiffs-age-and-20-year-adjournment-deleted-matter-listed-for-july
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Modifies “2046 Order” in Defamation Suit: References to Plaintiff’s Age and 20-Year Adjournment Deleted; Matter Listed for July [Read Order]

Bombay HC modifies ‘2046’ defamation order, deletes age and 20-year adjournment remarks, lists case for July 15, 2026 hearing.

30 April, 2026 01:18 PM

TOP STORIES

enough-is-enough-scwla-president-mahalakshmi-pavani-condemns-barbaric-attempt-to-murder-advocate-madhu-seeks-immediate-arrest-of-accused
Trending Legal Insiders
“Enough is Enough”: SCWLA President Mahalakshmi Pavani Condemns Barbaric Attempt to Murder Advocate Madhu, Seeks Immediate Arrest of Accused [Read Press Release]

SCWLA condemns brutal sword attack on Advocate Madhu Rajput; critical at AIIMS, accused absconding, immediate arrest demanded.

25 April, 2026 01:24 PM
sc-sets-3-week-deadline-for-nationwide-icu-standards-orders-states-to-submit-action-plans
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets 3-Week Deadline for Nationwide ICU Standards; Orders States to Submit Action Plans [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs States to finalise ICU standards within 3 weeks, impleads Nursing and Paramedical Councils in nationwide framework push.

25 April, 2026 04:30 PM
continuous-mobile-location-sharing-cannot-be-imposed-as-a-bail-condition-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
Continuous Mobile Location-Sharing Cannot Be Imposed As A Bail Condition: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court quashes bail condition mandating continuous mobile location-sharing, holding it amounts to impermissible electronic surveillance.

25 April, 2026 04:40 PM
police-cannot-arrest-accused-in-private-complaint-cases-absent-non-bailable-warrant-high-courts-should-not-entertain-anticipatory-bail-in-such-matters-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Arrest Accused in Private Complaint Cases Absent Non-Bailable Warrant; High Courts Should Not Entertain Anticipatory Bail in Such Matters: SC

Supreme Court rules police cannot arrest in private complaints without NBW; says High Courts should not entertain anticipatory bail in such cases.

25 April, 2026 05:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email