38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Slain Gangster's Wife Moves Supreme Court for Protection to Attend Husband's Funeral

By LawStreet News Network      08 June, 2023 09:52 PM      0 Comments
Slain Gangster's Wife Moves Supreme Court for Protection to Attend Husband's Funeral

NEW DELHI: A day after sensational killing of gangster Sanjeev Maheshwari alias Jeeva, his wife Payal on Thursday moved the Supreme Court for protection from arrest in a case to enable her to participate in last rites of her husband.

Jeeva was shot dead within Lucknow court premises by unknown assailants in a sensational shootout. Two police constables accompanying him also sustained injuries while one young girl also got seriously hurt in the incident. One of the shooters Vijay Yadav was apprehended from the spot.

The slain gangster was a close aide of gangster-politician Mukhtar Ansari.

In a plea, Payal, who also faced a gangster chart, sought one day protection from the top court to attend funeral of her husband.

Her counsel mentioned the matter before a vacation bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Rajesh Bindal for interim relief.

The bench put her plea for consideration on Friday.

The court also asked the petitioner's counsel to file an affidavit bringing on record the factum of death of her husband.

"We can't go by newspaper and TV reports," the bench said.

The counsel said she should be granted protection for today itself, as she had to console their children --three sons and a daughter-- and make all the arrangement since there was no one else in the family.

The Uttar Pradesh government led by Additional Advocate General Garima Prasad said the state government would have no objection if she is permitted to attend the cremation and other last rites.

Another Additional Advocate General Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad submitted that the petitioner first should file an application along with affidavit. He also said he had got instructions from the highest authorities, and cremation of the deceased is unlikely to take place on Thursday.

Payal had filed a special leave petition against the Allahabad High Court's order of May 30 which had dismissed her plea to quash the gangster case against her, which is pending.

Payal had unsuccessfully contested Assembly election in 2017 on RLD ticket from Muzaffarnagar.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email