38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supporting defamatory WhatsApp posts doesn’t constitute involvement in offence of defamation: MP HC [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      16 September, 2024 12:07 PM      0 Comments
Supporting defamatory WhatsApp posts doesnt constitute involvement in offence of defamation MP HC

Madhya Pradesh: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has delivered a significant ruling on the scope of defamation in WhatsApp group conversations, clarifying that merely agreeing with or supporting a potentially defamatory post does not necessarily constitute involvement in the offence of defamation.

Justice Subodh Abhyankar heard a petition filed by retired Air Marshal Harish Masand, challenging lower court orders that refused to take cognizance of his complaint against certain housing society members whom he had accused of defamation.

The court noted that the case originated from a dispute in a housing society’s WhatsApp group, where the petitioner alleged defamatory posts were made against him.

Examining the WhatsApp chats, Justice Abhyankar observed, “It is found that in the entire text of the WhatsApp group, only two persons, namely Sandeep Gupta and Lt. Col. Jagdish Pahuja, have expressed their views in detail, whereas the other persons have made only passing remarks, agreeing with Sandeep Gupta and Lt. Col. Jagdish Pahuja.”

The court held that while expressing agreement with a post through a one-liner may amount to agreeing with the expression, the context and purpose of the WhatsApp group must be considered. Justice Abhyankar stated, “This Court is also required to see the conversation in the WhatsApp group in its entirety, and has to see the context in which it is made, and also the purpose for which the WhatsApp group was formed.”

Emphasizing the importance of intent, the court observed, “These comments appear to have been made without any premeditation, and on the spur of the moment only. They appear to have been made without any intention of defaming the petitioner, and in such circumstances, they cannot be held liable for the long posts which are made by only two members of the said group.”

In conclusion, the court found no illegality in the lower courts’ decisions to take cognizance only against the two accused persons who had made detailed posts, while not proceeding against others who had merely agreed or made brief comments.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered filing of complaint against petitioner for submitting fabricated documents Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered filing of complaint against petitioner for submitting fabricated documents

The Court pointed out one medical document in particular, wherein there was mentioning of labour pains and contradicted that since petitioner is a male, it makes no sense. In view of the above, the Court opined that the Petitioner unabashedly filed fake documents with utter disdain and disregard for the Court.

Supreme Court allows Jr. Judge appointment to woman denied the same due to dog bite case Supreme Court allows Jr. Judge appointment to woman denied the same due to dog bite case

The Supreme Court of India overturns Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision, ordering the appointment of a woman who was previously denied the position of Civil Judge (Junior Division) due to a past minor offence related to a dog bite case. The Court emphasizes fairness and justice in its landmark ruling.

Fashionable to demolish homes without following natural justice, Madhya Pradesh HC on bulldozer action in Ujjain Fashionable to demolish homes without following natural justice, Madhya Pradesh HC on bulldozer action in Ujjain

Madhya Pradesh High Court says it has become fashionable to demolish any house without complying with natural justice.

Supporting defamatory WhatsApp posts doesn’t constitute involvement in offence of defamation: MP HC [Read Order] Supporting defamatory WhatsApp posts doesn’t constitute involvement in offence of defamation: MP HC [Read Order]

The MP High Court ruled that merely agreeing with or supporting defamatory WhatsApp posts doesn't necessarily involve liability for defamation.

TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email