38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 01, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supporting defamatory WhatsApp posts doesn’t constitute involvement in offence of defamation: MP HC [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      16 September, 2024 12:07 PM      0 Comments
Supporting defamatory WhatsApp posts doesnt constitute involvement in offence of defamation MP HC

Madhya Pradesh: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has delivered a significant ruling on the scope of defamation in WhatsApp group conversations, clarifying that merely agreeing with or supporting a potentially defamatory post does not necessarily constitute involvement in the offence of defamation.

Justice Subodh Abhyankar heard a petition filed by retired Air Marshal Harish Masand, challenging lower court orders that refused to take cognizance of his complaint against certain housing society members whom he had accused of defamation.

The court noted that the case originated from a dispute in a housing society’s WhatsApp group, where the petitioner alleged defamatory posts were made against him.

Examining the WhatsApp chats, Justice Abhyankar observed, “It is found that in the entire text of the WhatsApp group, only two persons, namely Sandeep Gupta and Lt. Col. Jagdish Pahuja, have expressed their views in detail, whereas the other persons have made only passing remarks, agreeing with Sandeep Gupta and Lt. Col. Jagdish Pahuja.”

The court held that while expressing agreement with a post through a one-liner may amount to agreeing with the expression, the context and purpose of the WhatsApp group must be considered. Justice Abhyankar stated, “This Court is also required to see the conversation in the WhatsApp group in its entirety, and has to see the context in which it is made, and also the purpose for which the WhatsApp group was formed.”

Emphasizing the importance of intent, the court observed, “These comments appear to have been made without any premeditation, and on the spur of the moment only. They appear to have been made without any intention of defaming the petitioner, and in such circumstances, they cannot be held liable for the long posts which are made by only two members of the said group.”

In conclusion, the court found no illegality in the lower courts’ decisions to take cognizance only against the two accused persons who had made detailed posts, while not proceeding against others who had merely agreed or made brief comments.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered filing of complaint against petitioner for submitting fabricated documents Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered filing of complaint against petitioner for submitting fabricated documents

The Court pointed out one medical document in particular, wherein there was mentioning of labour pains and contradicted that since petitioner is a male, it makes no sense. In view of the above, the Court opined that the Petitioner unabashedly filed fake documents with utter disdain and disregard for the Court.

Supreme Court allows Jr. Judge appointment to woman denied the same due to dog bite case Supreme Court allows Jr. Judge appointment to woman denied the same due to dog bite case

The Supreme Court of India overturns Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision, ordering the appointment of a woman who was previously denied the position of Civil Judge (Junior Division) due to a past minor offence related to a dog bite case. The Court emphasizes fairness and justice in its landmark ruling.

Fashionable to demolish homes without following natural justice, Madhya Pradesh HC on bulldozer action in Ujjain Fashionable to demolish homes without following natural justice, Madhya Pradesh HC on bulldozer action in Ujjain

Madhya Pradesh High Court says it has become fashionable to demolish any house without complying with natural justice.

Supporting defamatory WhatsApp posts doesn’t constitute involvement in offence of defamation: MP HC [Read Order] Supporting defamatory WhatsApp posts doesn’t constitute involvement in offence of defamation: MP HC [Read Order]

The MP High Court ruled that merely agreeing with or supporting defamatory WhatsApp posts doesn't necessarily involve liability for defamation.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-directs-telangana-speaker-to-decide-disqualification-petitions
Trending Judiciary
SC directs Telangana Speaker to decide disqualification petitions against 10 rebel BRS MLAs within 3 months [Read Order]

SC orders Telangana Speaker to decide disqualification pleas against 10 rebel BRS MLAs within 3 months, stressing swift action on political defections.

31 July, 2025 04:58 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-govt-files-plea-in-sc-to-recall-2018-ban-on-older-vehicles
Trending Judiciary
Delhi govt files plea in SC to recall 2018 ban on older vehicles

Delhi govt moves SC to recall 2018 ban on 10-yr-old diesel, 15-yr-old petrol vehicles, citing lack of data and need for emission-based policy.

26 July, 2025 05:17 PM
sc-issues-guidelines-to-be-implemented-as-law-to-prevent-students-suicides
Trending Judiciary
SC issues guidelines to be implemented as law to prevent students suicides [Read Judgment]

SC issues 15-point guidelines to prevent student suicides; directs states to notify rules for coaching centres, mental health support, and monitoring.

26 July, 2025 05:30 PM
sc-lawyers-body-urges-cji-to-prohibit-advocates-creating-video-reels-in-premises-sharing-of-court-proceedings-clips
Trending Legal Insiders
SC lawyers body urges CJI to prohibit advocates creating video reels in premises; sharing of court proceedings clips [Read Letter]

SC lawyers urge CJI to ban video reels, photos & court clip sharing; say such acts breach Bar rules, risk security & distort judicial proceedings.

26 July, 2025 05:44 PM
delay-in-assent-to-bills-sc-allows-kerala-to-withdraw-pleas-against-state-guv
Trending Judiciary
Delay in assent to bills: SC allows Kerala to withdraw pleas against state Govt

SC allows Kerala govt to withdraw pleas against Governor over delay in bill assent, citing Tamil Nadu verdict; Centre opposed plea withdrawal.

26 July, 2025 05:52 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email