38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court applies BNSS provisions to PMLA Case, grants bail to alleged smuggler [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      23 October, 2024 12:54 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court applies BNSS provisions to PMLA Case grants bail to alleged smuggler

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has delivered a significant judgment granting bail to an alleged red sanders smuggler in a money laundering case, applying provisions of the new Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

Justices Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih made important observations on the applicability of BNSS provisions to PMLA cases and the rights of undertrial prisoners.

Supreme Court Applies BNSS Provisions to Money Laundering Case, Citing Section 479

The court addressed an appeal filed by Badshah Majid Malik against the Bombay High Court’s order denying him bail in a PMLA case. The court observed, “It has been noted that in the case of Vijay Madanlal Chaudhary vs. Union of India, (2022) SCC Online SC 926, the beneficial provision of Section 436A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) may apply to prosecution under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (for short, ‘the PMLA’), as Section 436A was added to the statute book after the enactment of the PMLA.”

The court highlighted the applicability of BNSS provisions, stating, “Therefore, a corresponding provision of Section 479(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNSS’) will apply to prosecution under the PMLA.”

Court Highlights Rights of Undertrial Prisoners, Orders Bail Under BNSS 2023

Regarding the appellant’s case, the court noted, “In the facts of the case, it is undisputed that the appellant has not been convicted of any offence in the past. Therefore, the first proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 479 of the BNSS will apply to this case, as it is admitted that the appellant has undergone detention for a period exceeding one-third of the maximum imprisonment provided for the alleged offence.”

The court granted bail to the appellant, ordering, “Hence, the appeal is allowed. The appellant is ordered to be enlarged on bail in terms of the first proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 479 of the BNSS. For that purpose, we direct that the appellant be produced before the Special Court within a maximum period of one week from today.”

To ensure the proper implementation of its order, the court provided specific instructions for the appellant’s release on bail, including directing the Special Court to set appropriate terms and conditions.

Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate, appeared on behalf of the appellant, along with other counsel. Mr. Suryaprakash V. Raju, Additional Solicitor General, appeared on behalf of the respondents, along with other counsel.

Badshah Majid Malik vs. Directorate of Enforcement & Ors.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email