38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, May 11, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court accepts DGCA's recommendations on airfare refund, travel agents to get refund only for tickets booked by them

By Jishu      02 October, 2020 12:51 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court DGCA Airticket Refund

The Supreme Court on Thursday (October 1, 2020) accepted the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) scheme for a refund of money for air tickets booked during the COVID-19 lockdown.

A three-judge Bench, headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan, endorsed the DGCA credit shell scheme which will be valid till March 31, and disposed of petitions on refund of air tickets booked for/during the lockdown.

The Bench said in cases where air tickets had been booked through agents, a refund will happen through them only. It directed the Ministry of Civil Aviation to issue the necessary notification in this regard.

The verdict approving the DGCA scheme is likely to benefit thousands of air passengers whose hard-earned money remained stuck with airlines after their air tickets were canceled due to the lockdown.

The Supreme Court on September 25 reserved its orders on a PIL seeking a full refund for air tickets booked during the lockdown, after hearing counsel for petitioner Pravasi Legal Cell, various airlines, the Centre, and the Directorate of Civil Aviation.

On behalf of the Centre, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had clarified that credit shell i.e. voucher facility can't be availed by travel agents who booked tickets during the lockdown.

Advocates representing airlines had talked about massive losses faced by them due to COVID-19 lockdown, while air travelers counsel had asserted that they cant be made to suffer and their money has to be refunded.

The DGCA had earlier told the top court that a full refund shall be provided by airlines immediately for tickets booked during the COVID-19 lockdown for domestic or international travel within the lockdown period.

If airlines were not able to refund on account of financial distress, they shall provide a credit shell equal to the amount of fare collected and this shall be issued in the name of the passenger who has booked the ticket for domestic travel directly or through an agent, including online platforms, the DGCA had said.

Passengers entitled to a full refund for air tickets booked during Lockdown 1 & 2 during which air travel was banned due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Centre had earlier told the Supreme Court.

If the tickets have been booked during the first lockdown period, i.e. 25th of March, 2020 to 14th of April, 2020 for the journeys to be undertaken in both first and second lockdown period i.e. from 25th of March, 2020 to 3rd of May, 2020, in all such cases, a full refund shall be given by the airlines immediately, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation had said regarding domestic airlines tickets booked directly by the passenger with airlines.

Similarly, for international travel when the ticket has been booked on an Indian carrier and the booking is ex-India, it had said, If the tickets have been booked during the lockdown period for travel within the lockdown period, in all such cases full refund shall be given by the airlines immediately. This amount shall be passed on immediately by the Agent to the passengers, as the case may be.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

mamata-banerjee-refuses-to-resign-after-historic-election-defeat
Trending Political NEWS
Mamata Banerjee Refuses to Resign After Historic Election Defeat

Mamata Banerjee defies convention, refuses to resign despite massive poll defeat—triggering a constitutional debate over mandate, legality, and democratic norms.

05 May, 2026 10:29 AM
delhi-hc-rejects-spicejets-review-petition-against-144-crore-deposit-order-imposes-50000-costs
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rejects SpiceJet’s Review Petition Against ₹144 Crore Deposit Order, Imposes ₹50,000 Costs

Delhi High Court rejects SpiceJet’s review against ₹144 crore deposit order in Maran dispute, imposes ₹50,000 costs for non-compliance with directions.

05 May, 2026 12:36 PM
silence-of-differently-abled-rape-victim-cannot-suppress-truth-courts-must-focus-on-substance-over-manner-of-expression-sikkim-hc
Trending Judiciary
Silence of Differently-Abled Rape Victim Cannot Suppress Truth; Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Manner of Expression: Sikkim HC [Read Judgment]

Sikkim High Court upholds rape conviction, ruling that a differently-abled victim’s silence cannot override credible medical and eyewitness evidence.

05 May, 2026 12:45 PM
sc-stays-5-lakh-cost-condition-for-setting-aside-non-bailable-warrants-against-accused-in-sfio-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Stays ₹5 Lakh Cost Condition for Setting Aside Non-Bailable Warrants Against Accused in SFIO Case [Read Order]

Supreme Court stays ₹5 lakh cost condition for setting aside non-bailable warrants in SFIO case, says validity of such condition needs examination.

05 May, 2026 12:56 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email