38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 07, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court directs ₹3 Lakh Compensation in dowry harassment case, upholds conviction [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      29 January, 2025 06:30 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court directs 3 Lakh Compensation in dowry harassment case upholds conviction

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has directed a man to pay ₹3 lakh as compensation to his former wife after ending their marriage over unmet dowry demands, while upholding his conviction under anti-dowry laws.

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Dowry Harassment Case, Orders ₹3 Lakh Compensation

A bench comprising Justices K.V. Viswanathan and S.V.N. Bhatti delivered the judgment, addressing dowry harassment and the appropriate legal remedies in such cases.

The case involved M. Venkateswaran, who was convicted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for harassing his wife over dowry demands. The marriage, which took place on March 31, 2006, lasted only three days.

Landmark Judgment: Supreme Court Enforces Anti-Dowry Laws with ₹3 Lakh Compensation Directive

The court noted that the accused refused to cooperate during the wedding reception when the bride’s family failed to meet his demand for 100 sovereigns of gold as dowry. Multiple witnesses testified to the harassment, including additional gold demands and the groom’s family’s non-cooperation during the wedding ceremonies.

In its directive, the court modified the sentence to the period already undergone (approximately three months) while maintaining the conviction. The court ordered, “The appellant shall deposit a sum of ₹3,00,000/- in the 4th Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai, within a period of four weeks, which shall be paid as compensation to PW-4 Sridevi.”

The court further emphasized that failure to pay the compensation would result in the dismissal of the appeal, requiring the appellant to serve the remainder of the original sentence.

Mr. M.P. Parthiban appeared for the appellant, while Mr. D. Kumanan represented the State.

Case Title: M. Venkateswaran Versus The State
 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-invokes-article-139a-withdraws-three-decade-old-criminal-revision-petitions-from-allahabad-hc-to-itself
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 139A, Withdraws Three Decade-Old Criminal Revision Petitions From Allahabad HC To Itself [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 139A to transfer three decade-old criminal revision petitions from Allahabad High Court to itself, citing exceptional delay and public importance.

06 March, 2026 04:18 PM
deity-may-not-vote-but-constitution-speaks-madras-hc-finds-wilful-contempt-over-delay-in-recovering-507-acres-of-temple-land
Trending Judiciary
“Deity May Not Vote, But Constitution Speaks”: Madras HC Finds Wilful Contempt Over Delay in Recovering 507 Acres of Temple Land [Read Order]

Madras High Court finds wilful contempt by officials for failing to recover 507 acres of temple land, remarking that a deity may not vote but the Constitution must protect its rights.

06 March, 2026 04:38 PM

TOP STORIES

maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM
allegations-in-abetment-to-suicide-case-cannot-travel-beyond-contents-of-suicide-note-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Allegations in Abetment to Suicide Case Cannot Travel Beyond Contents of Suicide Note: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes abetment to suicide case against 10 accused, holds complaint cannot go beyond contents of suicide note.

02 March, 2026 01:48 PM
epf-penalty-for-delayed-contribution-cannot-be-reduced-below-25-of-arrears-cgit-order-modified-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
EPF Penalty for Delayed Contribution Cannot Be Reduced Below 25% of Arrears; CGIT Order Modified: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court rules EPF penalty for delayed PF contributions cannot be reduced below 25% of arrears including interest; CGIT order modified.

02 March, 2026 01:57 PM
scwla-condemns-kanpur-bar-association-holi-event-seeks-disciplinary-action-and-gender-sensitisation-guidelines
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Condemns Kanpur Bar Association Holi Event, Seeks Disciplinary Action & Gender Sensitisation Guidelines [Read Press Release]

SCWLA condemns Kanpur Bar Holi event, seeks apology, disciplinary action & gender sensitisation norms over alleged objectification of women.

02 March, 2026 03:23 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email