New Delhi, India  
Judiciary

Supreme Court directs ₹3 Lakh Compensation in dowry harassment case, upholds conviction [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      29 January, 2025 06:30 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court directs 3 Lakh Compensation in dowry harassment case upholds conviction

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has directed a man to pay ₹3 lakh as compensation to his former wife after ending their marriage over unmet dowry demands, while upholding his conviction under anti-dowry laws.

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Dowry Harassment Case, Orders ₹3 Lakh Compensation

A bench comprising Justices K.V. Viswanathan and S.V.N. Bhatti delivered the judgment, addressing dowry harassment and the appropriate legal remedies in such cases.

The case involved M. Venkateswaran, who was convicted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for harassing his wife over dowry demands. The marriage, which took place on March 31, 2006, lasted only three days.

Landmark Judgment: Supreme Court Enforces Anti-Dowry Laws with ₹3 Lakh Compensation Directive

The court noted that the accused refused to cooperate during the wedding reception when the bride’s family failed to meet his demand for 100 sovereigns of gold as dowry. Multiple witnesses testified to the harassment, including additional gold demands and the groom’s family’s non-cooperation during the wedding ceremonies.

In its directive, the court modified the sentence to the period already undergone (approximately three months) while maintaining the conviction. The court ordered, “The appellant shall deposit a sum of ₹3,00,000/- in the 4th Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai, within a period of four weeks, which shall be paid as compensation to PW-4 Sridevi.”

The court further emphasized that failure to pay the compensation would result in the dismissal of the appeal, requiring the appellant to serve the remainder of the original sentence.

Mr. M.P. Parthiban appeared for the appellant, while Mr. D. Kumanan represented the State.

Case Title: M. Venkateswaran Versus The State
 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-stays-delhi-high-court-order-holding-law-students-cannot-be-barred-from-exams-for-low-attendance
Trending Judiciary
SC Stays Delhi High Court Order Holding Law Students Cannot Be Barred From Exams for Low Attendance

Supreme Court stays Delhi High Court ruling barring detention of law students from exams due to low attendance; hearing set for July 21, 2026.

27 May, 2026 10:41 AM
rajasthan-hc-bars-accused-in-pocso-case-from-using-social-media-for-one-year-as-condition-of-bail
Trending Judiciary
Rajasthan HC Bars Accused in POCSO Case from Using Social Media for One Year as Condition of Bail [Read Order]

Rajasthan HC granted bail in a POCSO case with a condition barring the accused from using social media for one year.

27 May, 2026 10:47 AM

TOP STORIES

calcutta-hc-refuses-to-stall-wb-govts-cattle-slaughter-rules-ahead-of-eid-orders-state-to-clarify-cow-sacrifice-not-religious-requirement
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Refuses To Stall WB Govt’s Cattle Slaughter Rules Ahead Of Eid, Orders State To Clarify ‘Cow Sacrifice Not Religious Requirement’ [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court Refuses To Stay WB Cattle Slaughter Rules Ahead Of Eid, Says Cow Sacrifice Not Essential Religious Practice Under Islam

22 May, 2026 03:34 PM
wife-marrying-off-daughter-secretly-constitutes-mental-cruelty-to-husband-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Wife Marrying Off Daughter Secretly Constitutes Mental Cruelty to Husband: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court grants divorce, holding that secretly arranging daughter’s marriage without informing the father amounts to mental cruelty.

22 May, 2026 05:01 PM
garam-masala-mistaken-for-heroin-mp-hc-awards-rs-10-lakh-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Garam Masala Mistaken for Heroin, MP HC Awards Rs 10 Lakh Compensation [Read Order]

‘Garam Masala’ Flagged as Heroin at Airport: Businessman Jailed for 57 Days, MP High Court Grants Rs 10 Lakh Compensation

22 May, 2026 05:06 PM
bcci-not-a-public-authority-under-rti-act-rules-central-information-commission
Trending Business
BCCI Not a Public Authority Under RTI Act, Rules Central Information Commission [Read Order]

CIC rules BCCI is not a ‘public authority’ under the RTI Act, holding it receives no substantial government control or financing.

22 May, 2026 05:51 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email