38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 20, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court directs ₹3 Lakh Compensation in dowry harassment case, upholds conviction [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      29 January, 2025 06:30 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court directs 3 Lakh Compensation in dowry harassment case upholds conviction

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has directed a man to pay ₹3 lakh as compensation to his former wife after ending their marriage over unmet dowry demands, while upholding his conviction under anti-dowry laws.

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Dowry Harassment Case, Orders ₹3 Lakh Compensation

A bench comprising Justices K.V. Viswanathan and S.V.N. Bhatti delivered the judgment, addressing dowry harassment and the appropriate legal remedies in such cases.

The case involved M. Venkateswaran, who was convicted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for harassing his wife over dowry demands. The marriage, which took place on March 31, 2006, lasted only three days.

Landmark Judgment: Supreme Court Enforces Anti-Dowry Laws with ₹3 Lakh Compensation Directive

The court noted that the accused refused to cooperate during the wedding reception when the bride’s family failed to meet his demand for 100 sovereigns of gold as dowry. Multiple witnesses testified to the harassment, including additional gold demands and the groom’s family’s non-cooperation during the wedding ceremonies.

In its directive, the court modified the sentence to the period already undergone (approximately three months) while maintaining the conviction. The court ordered, “The appellant shall deposit a sum of ₹3,00,000/- in the 4th Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai, within a period of four weeks, which shall be paid as compensation to PW-4 Sridevi.”

The court further emphasized that failure to pay the compensation would result in the dismissal of the appeal, requiring the appellant to serve the remainder of the original sentence.

Mr. M.P. Parthiban appeared for the appellant, while Mr. D. Kumanan represented the State.

Case Title: M. Venkateswaran Versus The State
 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

srinagar-court-grants-transit-remand-of-alleged-co-conspirator-in-red-fort-car-blast-to-nia-for-production-before-delhi-court
Trending Judiciary
Srinagar Court Grants Transit Remand of Alleged Co-Conspirator in Red Fort Car Blast to NIA for Production Before Delhi Court

Srinagar court grants NIA transit remand of alleged Red Fort blast co-conspirator Jasir Bilal Wani for production before Delhi Special Court.

19 November, 2025 03:13 PM
credai-wins-major-relief-as-supreme-court-recalls-ruling-invalidating-ex-post-facto-environmental-clearances
Trending Business
CREDAI Wins Major Relief as Supreme Court Recalls Ruling Invalidating Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court recalls its ruling against ex post facto environmental clearances after CREDAI’s review, restoring the case for fresh consideration.

19 November, 2025 03:33 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-slams-maharashtra-police-over-four-year-delay-in-framing-charges-seeks-explanation-from-sp-and-trial-court
Trending Judiciary
SC Slams Maharashtra Police Over Four-Year Delay In Framing Charges; Seeks Explanation From SP And Trial Court [Read Order]

The Supreme Court criticises Maharashtra Police for a four-year delay in framing charges and seeks explanations from the SP and Trial Court over prolonged incarceration.

14 November, 2025 10:19 AM
jharkhand-hc-dismisses-pil-seeking-mandatory-disclosure-of-criminal-cases-against-election-candidates
Trending Judiciary
Jharkhand HC Dismisses PIL Seeking Mandatory Disclosure of Criminal Cases Against Election Candidates [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court dismisses PIL seeking mandatory disclosure of pending criminal cases against election candidates, holding no statutory duty exists.

14 November, 2025 11:19 AM
calcutta-hc-sets-aside-speakers-order-declares-mukul-roy-disqualified-under-tenth-schedule-from-june-11-2021
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Sets Aside Speaker’s Order; Declares Mukul Roy Disqualified Under Tenth Schedule From June 11, 2021 [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court sets aside the Speaker’s order and declares Mukul Roy disqualified under the Tenth Schedule with effect from June 11, 2021.

14 November, 2025 11:58 AM
remarriage-does-not-extinguish-statutory-right-to-compassionate-appointment-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Remarriage Does Not Extinguish Statutory Right To Compassionate Appointment: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Remarriage does not bar compassionate appointment, rules Kerala High Court, holding that dependents retain statutory rights under Rule 51B despite remarriage.

14 November, 2025 12:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email