38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court imposes Rs 25k cost on petitioner alleging mistrial in Gandhi assassination case [Read Order]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      25 April, 2023 01:27 AM      0 Comments
SC imposes Rs 25k cost on petitioner alleging mistrial in Gandhi assassination case

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has imposed Rs 25,000 as cost on 'Abhinav Bharat Congress', which alleged mistrial in the Mahatma Gandhi assassination case in 1948, by terming the plea as the "most misconceived".

The petitioner organisation led by its founding president Dr Pankaj K Phadnis asked the court to hold that the Bombay Public Measures (Delhi Amendment) Act, Act 52 of 1948 is ultra vires of Constitution of India and its application in REX vs. Nathuram Godse resulted in a mistrial.

Consequently, the plea stated, in partial atonement of injustice done to Veer Savarkar, the Union government may be directed to form an empowered committee of eminent persons including representative of Abhinav Bharat for giving Overseas Scholarship to meritorious students for undertaking post graduate studies as envisaged by Veer Savarkar in 1944.

The petitioner also sought a direction to the Union government to issue a public apology to the younger brother of Mrs Manorama Salvi Apte, Dr Balchandra Daulatrao Salvi for "being responsible for custodial murder of his brother in law-Mr Apte".

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Ahsanuddin Amanullah said, "It is the most misconceived petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. The parties cannot walk into the Supreme Court with any pleading or with any prayer they want."

The bench said, "Since it is a party in person, we are still showing some concession and dismiss the writ petition only with a cost of Rs.25,000 to be deposited with the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Welfare Fund within four weeks."

[Read Order] 



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-issues-notice-on-ashwini-upadhyays-plea-seeking-biometric-and-facial-recognition-for-voters
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Ashwini Upadhyay’s Plea Seeking Biometric and Facial Recognition for Voters

Supreme Court issues notice on Ashwini Upadhyay’s plea seeking biometric and facial recognition of voters to curb electoral malpractices.

13 April, 2026 05:11 PM
gujarat-hc-grants-bail-to-13-year-old-juvenile-says-jj-act-overrides-crpc-in-bail-matters
Trending Judiciary
Gujarat HC Grants Bail to 13-Year-Old Juvenile, Says JJ Act Overrides CrPC in Bail Matters [Read Order]

Gujarat High Court grants bail to 13-year-old, rules JJ Act prevails over CrPC in juvenile bail matters under Section 12.

13 April, 2026 05:19 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-criminal-case-against-paediatric-surgeon-who-removed-undescended-testicle-of-one-and-a-half-year-old
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes Criminal Case Against Paediatric Surgeon Who Removed Undescended Testicle of One-and-a-Half-Year-Old [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes 20-year criminal case against paediatric surgeon, holds prosecution over orchidectomy was abuse of process.

07 April, 2026 02:01 PM
allahabad-hc-seeks-explanation-from-mact-officer-over-6-year-delay-in-motor-accident-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Seeks Explanation from MACT Officer Over 6-Year Delay in Motor Accident Compensation [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court seeks explanation from MACT officer for blocking widow’s motor accident compensation for over six years despite Lok Adalat order.

07 April, 2026 02:06 PM
calling-someone-bastard-in-the-heat-of-an-argument-is-not-an-obscene-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Someone ‘Bastard’ in the Heat of an Argument Is Not an Obscene Act: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules abusive words like “bastard” aren’t obscene under Section 294 IPC, quashes conviction, distinguishes vulgarity from obscenity.

07 April, 2026 02:10 PM
cheque-bounce-case-not-maintainable-if-part-payments-are-not-disclosed-or-endorsed-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque Bounce Case Not Maintainable if Part Payments Are Not Disclosed or Endorsed: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court upholds acquittal in cheque bounce case, ruling undisclosed part payments negate legally enforceable debt under Section 138 NI Act.

07 April, 2026 02:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email