Sr Adv Pinky Anand mentions the plea by a Muslim woman challenging the practice of Talaq e Hasan
Anand: 2 notices have been sent to me.
SC: why under Article 32?
Anand: Talaq E Hasan has three notices. First notice was on April 19 and last one was on May 19.
SC: there is no urgency. We will have this after the vacations
Anand: By that time everything will be over and third talaq will be given. It is about a women being abused
Justice Chandrachud: There is no urgency in this. Let us have this after vacations. You wait for a period after first notice and then come here
Anand persists: please wait milord. Everything will be over. The third talaq will be done
SC: mention again next week then
Anand: Please mention this in order milord
SC: There is no urgency in this. You can wait. You mention again next week. Let's see.
Justice DY Chandrachud observes that there is no urgency to list the plea by a woman challenging the practice of Talaq E Hasan. Questions why "under Article 32.". Allows plea to be again mentioned next week.
