38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court orders reinstatement of property to elderly mother, upholds wide powers of maintenance tribunals under Senior Citizens Act [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      04 January, 2025 02:46 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court orders reinstatement of property to elderly mother upholds wide powers of maintenance tribunals under Senior Citizens Act

New Delhi: The Supreme Court’s Division Bench has delivered a significant judgment upholding senior citizens’ rights while interpreting the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

Also Read-  Right to file appeal under law for senior citizens law can't be exercised by children: SC [Read Judgment]

Justices C.T. Ravikumar and Sanjay Karol addressed an appeal challenging the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s order that had restricted tribunals’ powers under Section 23 of the Act.

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Elderly Rights: Gift Deed Revoked for Breach of Care Obligation

The case stemmed from a property dispute where a mother had executed a gift deed in favor of her son in 2019, conditional upon his taking care of her. When he failed to fulfill this obligation, she sought to void the transfer under the Act.

The court noted, “The Act is a beneficial piece of legislation, aimed at securing the rights of senior citizens, in view of the challenges faced by them. It is in this backdrop that the Act must be interpreted and a construction that advances the remedies of the Act must be adopted.”

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents Act: Tribunal Powers to Protect Senior Citizens Upheld

Addressing the High Court’s restrictive interpretation, the court observed, “We are unable to agree with the view taken by the Division Bench, because it takes a strict view of a beneficial legislation.”

The Division Bench set aside the High Court’s judgment and ordered restoration of property possession to the mother by February 28, 2025. The court stated, “The relief available to senior citizens under Section 23 is intrinsically linked with the statement of objects and reasons of the Act, that elderly citizens of our country, in some cases, are not being looked after.”

Also Read -  Tribunals under senior citizens protection law can order eviction: SC [Read Judgment]

The court emphasized that tribunals under the Act can order eviction if necessary for protecting senior citizens, clarifying that this power is essential to provide speedy and effective remedies to the elderly.

For the appellant: Ms. V. Mohana, Senior Advocate

For the respondents: Ms. Madhavi Divan, Senior Advocate

Case title: Urmila Dixit v. Sunil Sharan Dixit & Ors.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email