38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Judiciary

Plea in Supreme Court Seeking CBI Investigation in the 2016 Jawahar Bagh Massacre [Read Plea]

By Harshil Jain      15 July, 2020 01:49 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Seeking CBI Investigation Jawahar Bagh Massacre

A writ petition under Article 32 has been filed in the apex court seeking directions to the Central Bureau of Investigation for the constitution of a special team with an adequate number of officers in it, to expeditiously investigate in the 2016 Jawahar Bagh massacre case of Mathura, UP.

The plea has been filed by Archana Dwivedi, a widow of former SP of Mathura Mukul Dwivedi, who was killed in the mishap. Along with Mukul, 30 other persons had lost their lives in the rampage. The petitioner had filed the plea through Advocate Ashwini Kumar Dubey.

On 2 March 2017, the Allahabad High Court had transferred the case to CBI and directed it to constitute two teams to investigate the matter within two months. However, 40 months have passed and no politician or any top official has been interrogated so far, the petitioner submitted. She urged the Court to issue a direction to the CBI to provide the Court with answers, addressing the reasons for continued inaction of the State.

The plea read, “This is very suggestive of a larger criminal conspiracy. Policemen witnessed this gigantic violence but no punitive action, even suspension, has been taken against the higher authorities accountable for this gigantic violence. That is why the petitioner has every reason to doubt the credibility and fairness of the investigation. Even after 40 months, CBI has not examined the call details of Ram Briksh Yadav and his associates and petitioner’s husband to date.”

The evidence present at the site were all destroyed by the authorities to hamper the investigation and alleged connections with politicians and other higher officials, the petitioner added, also, it is unclear whether Ram Briksh Yadav is dead or alive because the forensic investigation, including DNA tests, was not conducted.

Background of the Case-

Jawahar Bagh is a government-owned property spread over 280 acres of land in the city of Mathura, Uttar Pradesh. Ram Briksh Yadav, along with his criminal accomplices, had wrongfully occupied the Bagh in March 2014 for more than two years. But no sincere efforts were made to vacate it because the prime defaulters enjoyed political immunity and had close nexus with the then-ruling political party.

However, in 2016, a contempt application was filed to vacate the park. Thereafter, on 2 June 2016, senior administrative and police officers including the then DM and SSP, with alleged politically motivated intentions, ordered the petitioner’s husband, Late Mukul Dwivedi, SP Mathura, to go with a few policemen without firearms (carrying only lathis) and break the boundary wall of the park to assess the extent of reaction.

Yadav and his associates attacked the policemen with country-made pistols and set about 175 cylinders on fire. This led to extreme violence in the area. SP Mukul Dwivedi and SHO Farah Sh. Santosh Yadav was brutally killed in the furor.

The petitioner alleged that no punitive actions were taken against the then DM and SSP Mathura. Also, there appears to be huge pressure on the CBI to protect allegedly guilty politicians and other top officials who were involved in the case, she added.

The plea sought access to all relevant records and an “in-depth investigation” to identify persons responsible for the dereliction of duty of police officers and the Mathura district administration.

 

[Read Plea]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

a-critique-of-the-supreme-courts-adventurism-for-lgbtqia-rights
Trending Legal Insiders
Overreaching Jurisdiction: A critique of the Supreme Court's adventurism for LGBTQIA rights

In its over-enthusiasm to protect LGBTQIA+ rights, has the Supreme Court exceeded its constitutional mandate under Article 142? A Delhi University research scholar evaluates the theme.

22 April, 2024 10:48 AM
new-criminal-laws-watershed-moment-for-society-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
New criminal laws watershed moment for society: CJI [Read Inaugural Remarks]

CJI Chandrachud hails new criminal laws as a watershed moment, marking a significant overhaul for the justice system, emphasizing adaptation and technology's role.

22 April, 2024 11:26 AM

TOP STORIES

burden-to-prove-dishonest-damage-to-electric-meter-is-for-electricity-theft-is-on-the-prosecution-says-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Burden to prove dishonest damage to electric meter is for electricity theft, is on the prosecution: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court has held that the burden to prove that a person has ‘dishonestly’ damaged an electric meter to commit electricity theft is on the prosecution.

17 April, 2024 05:41 PM
pil-filed-by-ashwini-kumar-upadhyay-in-sc-for-yr-bachelor-of-law-degree-after-class
Trending Judiciary
PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in SC for 3-yr Bachelor of Law degree after Class XII

PIL by Ashwini Kumar in SC seeks to shorten law degree to 3 years post-Class XII, citing current 5-year span as irrational.

18 April, 2024 11:21 AM
centre-sets-up-high-powered-committee-to-suggest-measures-to-end-discrimination-against-queer-community
Trending Executive
Centre sets up high-powered committee to suggest measures to end discrimination against queer community [Read Order]

Centre forms committee to end discrimination against the queer community, chaired by the Cabinet Secretary, following a Supreme Court directive.

18 April, 2024 12:11 PM
after-karnataka-hc-delhi-hc-sets-aside-government-circular-banning-23-ferocious-dog-breeds
Trending Judiciary
After Karnataka HC, Delhi HC sets aside Government circular banning 23 'ferocious' dog breeds [Read Judgement]

After Karnataka High Court, the Delhi High Court has set aside a Government circular banning 23 'ferocious' dog breeds.

18 April, 2024 01:06 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email