38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, December 03, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Seeks Details of Lord Krishna's Birthplace Dispute Pending Before Allahabad High Court

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      24 July, 2023 09:56 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Seeks Details of Lord Krishna's Birthplace Dispute Pending Before Allahabad High Court

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said multiplicity of proceedings and delay with regard to dispute over Lord Krishna's birthplace were not in the interest of anybody as it apparently favoured the suits being tried by the Allahabad High Court.

The top court, however, sought details of the pending suits related to Krishna Janmabhoomi at Mathura, which have been transferred by the Allahabad High Court to itself for adjudication.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia said pendency of matter causes its own disquiet as multiple suits have been filed in the matter.

"It is in the larger interest of everybody that the matter is decided at a higher level," the bench orally said.

The HC's single judge bench had on May 26, 2023 said the pending matters were related to issue of "seminal public importance affecting the masses beyond tribe and communities" and had not proceeded an inch further for the past two to three years, which provided full justification for withdrawal and transfer of those suits to the High Court.

Taking up a plea by the Muslim side, which challenged the validity of the High Court's May 26 order on transfer of suits, the bench asked if it is not in the interest of everybody that the suits are consolidated and tried at the higher level at the earliest.

A counsel for the petitioner Committee of Management Trust, Shahi Masjid Idgah contended the suits were filed only in 2020. The transfer petition was, however, filed in the HC with regard to one suit.

They also said that the transfer of suits would deprive the parties of an appellate jurisdiction and all the parties do not have wherewithal to travel to the High Court.

The bench again said it would be better if the issue is settled at higher level.

The court, however, asked HC's Registrar General to provide information of the suits ordered to be clubbed and transferred by the High Court to itself.

It is to be noted that suits related to Ram Janmabhoomi at Ayodhya was also transferred for trial before the High Court on July 10, 1989, which was decided on September 30, 2010. The Supreme Court on November 9, 2019 decided the dispute in favour of Hindu side.

In the instant case, the Allahabad High Court on May 26, 2023 ordered for transfer of all the cases related to Krishna Janmabhoomi pending before the Mathura court to itself.

The order was passed on a transfer petition filed by Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman and seven others.

The court had then also exercised its suo motu power for the suits of similar nature, by withdrawing it from the lower civil court concerned and transferred those to the High Court.

A plea was first filed in the court of civil judge senior division on September 25, 2020 by Lucknow-resident Ranjana Agnihotri, and others as the "next friend of Bhagwan Sri Krishna Virajman".

It said that Shahi Idgah Masjid is constructed on a part of 13.37 acre land belonging to the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust. They had demanded the mosque be removed and the land returned to the Trust.

They also contended that the Shahi Idgah Mosque had been built by Mughal emperor Aurangzeb after demolishing a part of the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi.

They have also challenged the 1968 agreement between the Shahi Idgah Mosque Committee and the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust allowing the Mosque to continue to exist and use the land on which it was situated.

They also made claim over the entire birth place of Lord Krishna and sought removal of alleged encroachment of superstructure built as Shahi Idgah masjid over there.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

allahabad-hc-condemns-police-for-taking-woman-into-possession-despite-stay-orders-immediate-release
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Condemns Police for Taking Woman Into ‘Possession’ Despite Stay; Orders Immediate Release [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court slammed Muzaffarnagar Police for violating a stay order, declaring the detenue a major and ordering her immediate release.

02 December, 2025 09:27 PM
rera-orders-cannot-be-executed-through-civil-court-execution-petitions-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
RERA Orders Cannot Be Executed Through Civil Court Execution Petitions: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court rules RERA orders cannot be executed through civil courts, holding that such orders are not decrees under the CPC.

02 December, 2025 10:19 PM

TOP STORIES

forklifts-and-cranes-used-inside-factory-are-motor-vehicles-registration-and-tax-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Forklifts And Cranes Used Inside Factory Are ‘Motor Vehicles’; Registration & Tax Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that forklifts and cranes used inside factories are ‘motor vehicles’, requiring mandatory registration and tax under motor vehicle laws.

27 November, 2025 10:29 AM
loading-of-mineral-constitutes-transportation-us-21-4-of-the-mmdra-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Loading of Mineral Constitutes ‘Transportation’ U/S 21(4) Of The MMDRA: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC rules that loading minerals into a vehicle amounts to transportation under Section 21(4) of the MMDRA, upholding seizure for illegal mineral movement.

27 November, 2025 10:43 AM
sc-upholds-himachal-pradeshs-cancellation-of-tender-loi-sets-aside-high-court-order
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Himachal Pradesh’s Cancellation of Tender LoI, Sets Aside High Court Order [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds Himachal Pradesh’s cancellation of a PDS tender LoI, ruling it created no enforceable rights and overturning the High Court order.

27 November, 2025 10:57 AM
chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-pg-medical-admission-rules-for-violating-article-14-rejects-institutional-domicile-preference-upholds-merit
Trending Judiciary
Chhattisgarh HC Quashes PG Medical Admission Rules for Violating Article 14, Rejects Institutional/Domicile Preference, Upholds Merit [Read Order]

Chhattisgarh High Court quashes PG medical admission rules, holding institutional and domicile-based preferences unconstitutional and affirming merit.

27 November, 2025 11:16 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email