38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, July 05, 2024
Judiciary

Supreme Court Seeks Details of Lord Krishna's Birthplace Dispute Pending Before Allahabad High Court

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      24 July, 2023 09:56 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Seeks Details of Lord Krishna's Birthplace Dispute Pending Before Allahabad High Court

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said multiplicity of proceedings and delay with regard to dispute over Lord Krishna's birthplace were not in the interest of anybody as it apparently favoured the suits being tried by the Allahabad High Court.

The top court, however, sought details of the pending suits related to Krishna Janmabhoomi at Mathura, which have been transferred by the Allahabad High Court to itself for adjudication.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia said pendency of matter causes its own disquiet as multiple suits have been filed in the matter.

"It is in the larger interest of everybody that the matter is decided at a higher level," the bench orally said.

The HC's single judge bench had on May 26, 2023 said the pending matters were related to issue of "seminal public importance affecting the masses beyond tribe and communities" and had not proceeded an inch further for the past two to three years, which provided full justification for withdrawal and transfer of those suits to the High Court.

Taking up a plea by the Muslim side, which challenged the validity of the High Court's May 26 order on transfer of suits, the bench asked if it is not in the interest of everybody that the suits are consolidated and tried at the higher level at the earliest.

A counsel for the petitioner Committee of Management Trust, Shahi Masjid Idgah contended the suits were filed only in 2020. The transfer petition was, however, filed in the HC with regard to one suit.

They also said that the transfer of suits would deprive the parties of an appellate jurisdiction and all the parties do not have wherewithal to travel to the High Court.

The bench again said it would be better if the issue is settled at higher level.

The court, however, asked HC's Registrar General to provide information of the suits ordered to be clubbed and transferred by the High Court to itself.

It is to be noted that suits related to Ram Janmabhoomi at Ayodhya was also transferred for trial before the High Court on July 10, 1989, which was decided on September 30, 2010. The Supreme Court on November 9, 2019 decided the dispute in favour of Hindu side.

In the instant case, the Allahabad High Court on May 26, 2023 ordered for transfer of all the cases related to Krishna Janmabhoomi pending before the Mathura court to itself.

The order was passed on a transfer petition filed by Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman and seven others.

The court had then also exercised its suo motu power for the suits of similar nature, by withdrawing it from the lower civil court concerned and transferred those to the High Court.

A plea was first filed in the court of civil judge senior division on September 25, 2020 by Lucknow-resident Ranjana Agnihotri, and others as the "next friend of Bhagwan Sri Krishna Virajman".

It said that Shahi Idgah Masjid is constructed on a part of 13.37 acre land belonging to the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust. They had demanded the mosque be removed and the land returned to the Trust.

They also contended that the Shahi Idgah Mosque had been built by Mughal emperor Aurangzeb after demolishing a part of the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi.

They have also challenged the 1968 agreement between the Shahi Idgah Mosque Committee and the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust allowing the Mosque to continue to exist and use the land on which it was situated.

They also made claim over the entire birth place of Lord Krishna and sought removal of alleged encroachment of superstructure built as Shahi Idgah masjid over there.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

The Orissa High Court has been without a permanent chief justice since January 5, 2020 after the retirement of former Chief Justice, KS Jhaveri. The high court is currently headed by acting Chief Justice Sanju Panda.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER] Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER]

without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage of investigation and the period of detention he faced in jail, the Court after analyzing all things allowed bail to the accused person ( Jai Ram). Himachal Pradesh High Court, Grant Bail, Justice Anup Chitrakara

How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.? How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.?

SHO Bhardwaj was quick to defend the Maulvi in questioning regarding the Mazar but harassed the reported who sought truth. Why did the SHO have to harass a Media reporter when he was doing his job? Who benefits from this? Why is there a Mazar on a flyover? Why is a Minority Welfare development Board in control of so much property? || #Mazar #SHOBhardwaj #Mazar #Mosque #WaqfBoard #Islam #News #Waqf #RemoveSHOBharadwaj

TRENDING NEWS

father-accused-of-molesting-minor-son-acquitted-due-to-inconsistent-testimonies
Trending Judiciary
Father accused of molesting minor son acquitted due to inconsistent testimonies [Read Judgement]

Dwarka Court acquits father of molestation charges under POCSO Act due to inconsistent testimonies from the minor son and lack of corroborative evidence.

04 July, 2024 05:22 PM
who-is-keir-starmer-the-former-human-rights-lawyer-set-to-become-britains-next-prime-minister
Trending International
Who is Keir Starmer ? The Former Human Rights Lawyer Set to Become Britain’s Next Prime Minister

Keir Starmer, former human rights lawyer and Labour Party leader, is set to become Britain's next Prime Minister, ending 14 years of Conservative rule.

05 July, 2024 10:36 AM

TOP STORIES

president-murmu-addresses-joint-sitting-of-parliament-here-are-the-key-highlights
Trending Legislative Corner
President Murmu addresses Joint Sitting of Parliament; here are the key highlights

President Murmu's first joint session address highlights Modi government's third term, high voter turnout in J&K, GST milestones, and recalls the 1975 Emergency.

29 June, 2024 10:51 AM
sikkim-hc-allows-revision-petition-condones-delay-in-filing-criminal-appeal-emphasizes-justice-over-technicalities
Trending Judiciary
Sikkim HC allows revision petition, Condones delay in filing criminal appeal, Emphasizes justice over technicalities [Read Judgement]

Sikkim High Court allows criminal revision petition, condones 388-day delay in filing appeal, and emphasizes justice over technicalities.

29 June, 2024 12:36 PM
bombay-hc-dismisses-plea-against-hijab-ban-upholds-college-dress-code
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC dismisses plea against Hijab ban, Upholds college dress code [Read Judgement]

The Bombay HC dismisses a petition challenging a college's hijab ban, upholding the dress code as constitutional and not infringing on religious freedoms.

29 June, 2024 01:07 PM
lawyers-cannot-be-forced-to-abstain-from-work-amid-black-day-protest-calcutta-hc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers Cannot Be Forced to Abstain from Work Amid 'Black Day' Protest: Calcutta HC [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court upholds lawyers' right to work amidst 'Black Day' protest, ruling Bar Council resolution non-binding.

29 June, 2024 05:59 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email