38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, June 22, 2024

Supreme Court Uses the Doctrine of Occupied Field to Strike Down the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 for Repugnancy with RERA, 2016

By Mathews Savio      05 May, 2021 12:48 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Strike Down the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation

The Supreme Court earlier today (04/05/2021), struck down the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 for repugnancy with the Central law, The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”).

The judgement was given by a bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah.

The matter came up before the Supreme Court as a writ petition (Forum for Peoples Collective Efforts v. State of West Bengal)filed by an NGO stating that the refusal of the West Bengal Government to implement RERA has resulted in losses for the state's home buyers.

The RERA was enacted by the Parliament in the year 2016 to holistically cover the legal requirements in real estate transactions by referring to the entries 6 (property transfer), 7 (matters of contract) and 46 (matters concerning the jurisdiction of courts other than Supreme Court) of the Concurrent List in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. Complying with the provisions of RERA the West Bengal Government had also notified draft Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2016 and public consultations on the rules were also undertaken. But no further actions were taken to finalise the rules. 

In 2018 the state enacted the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 which the petitioner alleged was related to the sale of housing property. The petitioner argued that though the state law talks about the housing industry and housing for all it was majorly concerned with the sale of products of the housing industry.

The state enactment was challenged by the petitioner based on Article 254 of the Constitution of India which lays down that in the case of an overlap between central and state laws in the concurrent list, the central law will prevail. It was submitted that the state law overlaps with the central law on several provision.

The court after hearing the counsel for the petitioner who pointed out the similarities between the two enactments held that:

“From our analysis of RERA and WBHIRA [West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017], two fundamental features that emerge are that WBHIRA overlaps with RERA and is copied word to word and it does not complement RERA. Both the statutes refer to the same entry in the concurrent list,”

During the hearing, the court also clarified that the doctrine of the occupied field as applied to the enactments in the concurrent list holds that even if there is no overlap between the central and state laws, if the central law is made to exhaustively cover matters of an entry, then there will be a repugnancy. 

But the court observed that in the present case there was a word-to-word copying of the central statute such that a test of repugnance based on the identity of subject matter is established. It was further observed that:

West Bengal has attempted to establish a parallel regime which is not Constitutionally permissible”

The court further observed that the only way for state enactment to survive the challenge of repugnancy is for it to get the assent of the President, as given in Article 254(2) of the Constitution, but in the present case no such assent has been obtained. It was held that:

It is an admitted position that the State of West Bengal neither reserved the impugned State Act for consideration of the President nor had ever obtained the President’s assent in spite of the fact that the entire field stood occupied by RERA, 2016 enacted by the Parliament."


Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Gravity of offence not relevant when considering bail for juvenile [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants bail to a juvenile in a serious criminal case, ruling that the gravity of the offence is not a relevant factor in bail decisions.

22 June, 2024 11:18 AM
Trending Executive
New Anti-Cheating Law enacted: Analysis

In-depth analysis of India’s new Anti-Cheating Law, the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, aimed at curbing exam malpractices.

22 June, 2024 11:38 AM


Trending Crime, Police And Law
Women, including housewife, approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh

Two women approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh, citing harassment for tweets based on news reports about his involvement in high-profile cases.

17 June, 2024 03:10 PM
Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [June 10 - June 15]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

17 June, 2024 03:29 PM
Trending Business
Man sues Apple for £5 million, blaming company for divorce after wife discovers ‘deleted messages’ with sex workers

A UK man sues Apple for £5M, claiming their unclear policy on deleted messages led to his divorce after his wife found texts to sex workers on another device.

17 June, 2024 04:26 PM
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, with protection of 'no arrest'

Ex-Karnataka CM Yediyurappa appears before CID for POCSO case probe, denies allegations, granted ‘no arrest’ protection. Next hearing: June 28.

17 June, 2024 04:46 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email