38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court strikes down ‘strange’ residence requirement in Delhi HC’s bail order [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      24 October, 2024 11:19 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court strikes down strange residence requirement in Delhi HCs bail order

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has modified a Delhi High Court bail order by removing unusual conditions that required the accused to arrange and maintain residence in Delhi during trial proceedings.

Justices Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih heard the criminal appeal arising from a Special Leave Petition challenging the bail conditions imposed by the Delhi High Court.

Supreme Court Removes Controversial Bail Conditions Imposed by Delhi High Court

The case involves appellant Akbal Ansari, who challenged certain conditions in the bail order granted by the Delhi High Court.

The court made significant observations about appropriate bail conditions, stating, “The High Court has recorded a finding that the appellant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

However, the High Court has imposed a strange condition of directing the appellant to arrange accommodation in Delhi and that the appellant should reside in Delhi till the conclusion of the trial. Such a condition cannot be said to be a condition of bail.”

Accused No Longer Required to Reside in Delhi During Trial, Rules Supreme Court

In its order, the Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal by setting aside condition numbers (ii), (iv), and (v) from paragraph 24 of the High Court’s order. The court instead added a new condition requiring the appellant to report to the local police station on the 1st and 15th of every calendar month between 10:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m.

The appellant was represented by Mr. M. L. Yadav, Mr. Harish Chand, Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Mr. Anant Chaittoria, Mr. Akash, Ms. Neha, and Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh as the Advocate on Record.

The respondent State was represented by Additional Solicitor General Mr. Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare, along with Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria as AOR, and advocates Mr. Prasanjeet Mohapatra, Mr. Gaurang Bhushan, Mr. Vijay Awana, and Ms. Sweksha.

Case Title: Akbal Ansari v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

in-house-procedure-had-legal-sanctity-sc-dismisses-justice-varmas-plea-against-recommendation-for-removal
Trending Judiciary
'In-house procedure had legal sanctity,' SC dismisses Justice Varma's plea against recommendation for removal

SC upholds in-house probe into Justice Varma, dismisses his plea against removal; says process is legally valid and judge’s conduct lacked credibility.

07 August, 2025 12:05 PM
sole-testimony-of-victim-even-without-medical-evidence-sufficient-to-uphold-rape-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sole testimony of victim even without medical evidence sufficient to uphold rape conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Victim’s sole testimony, even without medical evidence, sufficient to uphold rape conviction if found credible and consistent.

07 August, 2025 03:11 PM

TOP STORIES

bengaluru-court-convicts-ex-mp-prajwal-revanna-in-rape-case
Trending Judiciary
Bengaluru court convicts ex MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case

Bengaluru court convicts ex-MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case linked to explicit videos; one of four sexual abuse cases filed against him.

04 August, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-order-declaring-man-as-juvenile-on-basis-of-school-certificate
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside order declaring man as juvenile on basis of school certificate [Read Judgment]

SC: School certificate from private school not valid proof of age, sets aside order declaring murder accused as juvenile.

04 August, 2025 11:24 AM
hp-may-vanish-in-thin-air-god-forbid-sc-on-ecological-imbalance-in-himachal-pradesh
Trending Judiciary
‘HP may vanish in thin air, God forbid', SC on ecological imbalance in Himachal Pradesh [Read Order]

SC warns HP may vanish due to ecological imbalance; seeks state’s action plan amid rising disasters, deforestation, and climate change threats.

04 August, 2025 11:31 AM
sc-grants-4-weeks-time-to-centre-to-frame-guidelines
Trending Judiciary
SC grants 4 weeks time to Centre to frame guidelines to ensure pedestrians right to use footpath

SC gives Centre 4 weeks to frame guidelines ensuring pedestrians’ right to obstruction-free, accessible footpaths under Article 21.

04 August, 2025 11:41 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email