38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

[TRIPURA VIOLENCE] Supreme Court to hear petition filed by two lawyers & one journalist Shyam Meera Singh [Live Updates]

By LawStreet News Network      07 February, 2022 11:29 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court tripura violence journalist Shyam Meera Singh

Supreme Court to hear petition filed by two lawyers & one journalist Shyam Meera Singh, who were booked under UAPA by Tripura police over their social media posts & reports about Tripura Violence, seeking quashing of the FIRs.

Supreme Court will also hear another petition challenging notice issued by Tripura Police to Twitter, in respect of activist-journalist Samiullah Shabbir Khan's tweets about Tripura Violence. The notice asked Twitter to remove Tweet & sought details of IP address & phone number.

Adv Shahrukh Alam: Only the IA is on board today.

Adv Shuvodeep for State: We circulated a letter as we didnt have copy of the application

Adv Shahrukh Alam: I was asked to be present today. The earlier was not served upon us.

SC: We had stayed coercive steps for 2 weeks

SC: we can continue the same order

State of Tripura: please hold this over for two weeks

Justice Surya Kant: what do you mean hold over when we are issuing notice today

Tripura counsel: I mean adjourn

SC: Since the petitioner has been protected under January 10, 2022 order, no further steps be taken against him under Section 41A notice issued to him under the name of his mother

Supreme Court Warns State of Tripura that itll ask its Superintendent of Police & Home Secretary to appear before Court if found evading compliance of Courts orders in relation to Tripura Violence

Dont Harass People Supreme Court tells State of Tripura, with regard to notices issued to people even after Courts orders granting protection

Once weve passed order covering the issue you must show responsibility Justice Chandrachud said



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

TOP STORIES

in-house-procedure-had-legal-sanctity-sc-dismisses-justice-varmas-plea-against-recommendation-for-removal
Trending Judiciary
'In-house procedure had legal sanctity,' SC dismisses Justice Varma's plea against recommendation for removal

SC upholds in-house probe into Justice Varma, dismisses his plea against removal; says process is legally valid and judge’s conduct lacked credibility.

07 August, 2025 12:05 PM
sole-testimony-of-victim-even-without-medical-evidence-sufficient-to-uphold-rape-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sole testimony of victim even without medical evidence sufficient to uphold rape conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Victim’s sole testimony, even without medical evidence, sufficient to uphold rape conviction if found credible and consistent.

07 August, 2025 03:11 PM
sc-recalls-order-against-hc-judge-on-taking-away-criminal-roster
Trending Judiciary
SC recalls order against HC judge on taking away criminal roster

SC recalls order removing HC judge from criminal roster, cites institutional dignity; says directions weren’t to embarrass but to uphold judicial integrity.

08 August, 2025 12:43 PM
sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email