38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Upholds Relief to Telecom Companies on AGR Amidst Covid-19 [Read Order]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      11 September, 2023 12:31 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Upholds Relief to Telecom Companies on AGR Amidst Covid 19

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has upheld validity of the Union Cabinet's decision of September 15, 2021 providing huge relief to Telecom companies with regard to Adjusted Gross Revenue to the sum of over Rs one lakh crore in view of the significant role played by them during the Covid-19 pandemic.

A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan said any interference by the court in matters of policy and decision making would not only create uncertainty in implementation but also jeopardise the policy itself.

The court said it would not be justified on its part to interfere with a well calibrated decision of the Cabinet solely on the ground that the Supreme Court had earlier passed certain orders on September 01, 2020 on recovery of Adjusted Gross Revenue.

The bench said it may appear in a first blush that the Cabinet decision to initiate structural and procedural reforms and provide relief measures for the TSPs are contrary to the directions issued by this Court.

It would have been more appropriate for the central government to have filed an application in this regard, the bench said.

"But what is to be borne in mind is emerging situations in light of the Covid-19 pandemic that engulfed the world including India in the years 2020-2021 and the lifestyle of the people drastically changing on account of the precautions and preventive measures that had to be taken in order to save themselves from being afflicted by the pandemic which resulted not only in deaths but also post Covid-19 disabilities and ill health," the bench said.

The court also highlighted in the backdrop of the Covid-19 challenges, with huge surge in data consumption, online education, work from home, inter-personal connect through social media, virtual meetings, etc, reform measures were found necessary to boost the proliferation and penetration of broadband and telecom connectivity.

"In order to provide competition and consumer choice and for inclusive development and bringing the marginalised areas into the mainstream and universal broadband access to connect the unconnected, nine structural reforms and five procedural reforms plus relief measures for the telecom service providers were provided," the court noted.

The court dismissed a petition filed by Anshul Gupta, seeking implementation of the Supreme Court's judgement of September 1, 2020.

He claimed decision taken by the Union Cabinet vis-a-vis the telecom sector is an instance of clear interference in the payment schedule decided by this court and is directly benefiting the defaulters, which is discriminatory against private individuals and the common man and is in favour of the super rich.

"These are all matters of policy and decision making which is on the basis of experts opinion and on emerging situations and exigencies, to be made in the interest of the welfare of the people of India having serious technical and financial implications and, therefore, have to be in public interest. Hence, we do not think such Cabinet decisions could be lightly interfered with by a Court of law in the absence of there being any particulars or materials brought to the notice of the Court assailing the Cabinet decisions, as being unconstitutional or arbitrary in nature or contrary to law," the bench said.

The court said after the pandemic, the people depended heavily on the telecom sector as schools and educational institutions, and offices --private and government -- and courts which all were run on virtual mode, with huge investments for establishment and expansion of the infrastructure in view of a heavy surge of online facilities.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Supreme Court Upholds Relief to Telecom Companies on AGR Amidst Covid-19 [Read Order] Supreme Court Upholds Relief to Telecom Companies on AGR Amidst Covid-19 [Read Order]

Stay updated on the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the relief provided to Telecom companies regarding Adjusted Gross Revenue amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Learn why the Court dismissed a plea against this decision and its impact on policy-making.

TDS not to be deducted by Tele cos for selling discounted pre-paid SIM cards to distributors: SC [Read Judgment] TDS not to be deducted by Tele cos for selling discounted pre-paid SIM cards to distributors: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules telecoms like Bharti Airtel not liable for TDS on discounted SIM sales to distributors, overturning prior high court judgments.

TRENDING NEWS

arrest-and-remand-illegal-if-written-grounds-not-provided-two-hours-before-production-sc
Trending Judiciary
Arrest and Remand Illegal if Written Grounds Not Provided Two Hours Before Production: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules arrests and remands illegal if written grounds aren’t furnished at least two hours before the accused’s production before a Magistrate.

07 November, 2025 04:20 PM
adult-christian-daughter-not-entitled-to-maintenance-us-125-crpc-unless-disabled-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Adult Christian Daughter Not Entitled to Maintenance u/s 125 CrPC Unless Disabled: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court held that an adult Christian daughter cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC unless unable to maintain herself due to disability.

07 November, 2025 04:57 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email