38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Surrogate Woman Entitled to Maternity Leave Benefits : Himachal Pradesh HC [READ JUDGMENT]

By Snehal Khemka      08 March, 2021 06:07 PM      0 Comments
Surrogate Woman Entitled to Maternity Leave Benefits : Himachal Pradesh HC [ READ JUDGMENT]

A division bench comprising of Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Justice Sandeep Sharma of the Himachal Pradesh HC held that a surrogate woman, getting child through arrangement by surrogate parents, is entitled to avail maternity leave benefits under Rule 43(1) of CCS (Leave) Rules, 1972. 

The court held that a woman cannot be discriminated on the element of availing maternity benefits on the sole ground that she has obtained the baby through surrogacy. 

The petitioner, being a language teacher at a Government school had applied for maternity leave seeking clarification whether she would be entitled for maternity leave on undergoing through a surrogacy treatment. 

The High Court relying on the case of Baby Manju Yamada v. Union of India & Anr. (2008) 13 SCC 518 wherein various forms of surrogacy such as traditional, gestational, altruistic and commercial surrogacy claimed that on the repondents admission that the minor child is that of the petitioner, she is entitled to the leave akin to the persons, who are granted leave in terms of the rules. 

The court also relied on the judgement made in Dr. Hema Vijay Menon v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. AIR 2005 Bom 231 wherein the court made connections between maternity and motherhood, contending that it to be unfair to distinguish between a natural and a biological mother.

Lastly, observing the constitutional mandate under Article 42, the High Court allowed the petition and directed the respondent authorities to grant maternity leave to the petitioner under CCS(Leave) Rules, 1972.

 

[READ JUDGMENT]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email