38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

TikTok Ban: SC Rejects Plea To Transfer Case From Madras HC

By LawStreet News Network      04 July, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
TikTok Ban: SC Rejects Plea To Transfer Case From Madras HC

The Supreme Court today (July 4, 2019) refused to allow the plea of Chinese social media app TikTok for the transfer of case relating to its ban from the Madras High Court to itself.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi did not agree with the contention raised by senior advocate A.M. Singhvi, appearing for the Chinese firm, that all the matters pending in the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court be transferred here for final and expeditious disposal.

"We are not inclined to entertain this transfer petition," the Bench, also comprising of Justice Deepak Gupta, said prompting the firm to withdraw the petition.

Earlier, the Supreme Court had directed the Madras High Court to decide on April 24, 2019, the plea of TikTok seeking interim relief of lifting the ban imposed by it. Subsequently, the High Court lifted the ban on the social media app, however, with the condition that the platform should not be used to host obscene videos.

On April 3, 2019, the High Court had directed the Centre to ban mobile application TikTok as it had voiced concern over "pornographic and inappropriate content" being made available through such apps. It had passed an interim order on a public interest litigation which sought a ban on the app on the ground that it allegedly carried contents that "degraded culture and encouraged pornography."

Following the ban, the app was removed by both Google and Apple from their online stores.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email