38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court hearing plea by Mamta Banerjee's election agent & Trinamool Congress leader SK Supian

By LawStreet News Network      31 January, 2022 01:43 PM      0 Comments
Trinamool Congress leader SKSupian Mamta Banerjee Supreme Court

Supreme Court to today hear plea by Mamta Banerjee's election agent and Trinamool Congress leader SK Supian accused of killing a Bhartiya Janta Party Supporter Debabrata Maiti at Chillogram in Nandigram after the results were declared.

Supian has challenged the Calcutta High Court order dismissing his anticipatory bail application in the post-poll violence case.

A division bench of Justice L Nageswara Rao and Justice BR Gavai had recently granted interim protection to Supian after remarking that the court can hear the matter only after the statements are placed on record.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal begins his submission on behalf of Supian.

Sibal: First chargesheet did not name me as an accused. After that matter was taken over by CBI.

Sibal: The charge-sheet relies upon statements made under Sec.164 CrPC. These statements did not even mention my name. I was not made an accused even under the second charge-sheet.

Sibal: Suvendu Adhikari made statements saying he will have me arrested along with a few others.

Court asks ASG Aman Lekhi to provide relevant documents to the petitioner.

Court: The statements made under S.164 by Manoj Kumar Behra and Sulekha have not been provided to them.

Court: Statements recorded on November 11 and 18 have not been given to them.

ASG Lekhi: The second charge-sheet filed on January 6 have relied on these statements.

Sibal: I have not been provided these statements.

Senior Advocate Paramjit Patwalia appears on behalf of wife of the deceased.

Court: There is already a server issue. If all of you speak together we cant understand a thing.

Court: We will hear it on Thursday. Make sure all replies have been served to all the parties concerned.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email