38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

High Court Of Uttarakhand Directs Centre And State To Seek Replies About Virtual Post-Mortem

By ANUSHKA BHATNAGAR      21 September, 2021 03:12 PM      0 Comments
High Court Of Uttarakhand Directs Centre And State To Seek Replies About Virtual Post-Mortem

On 15th September 2021, the High Court of Uttarakhand passed an order demanding rely from the Central and State Government in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed regarding performing post-mortem in a virtual manner. 

 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION 

The Public Interest Litigation was filed against the present manner in which post-mortem of bodies are conducted, as per the PIL, these methods are inhuman and wrong. 

During the Covid pandemic, the post-mortem of bodies was conducted virtually with the help of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and CT scan which can continue even after the pandemic. 

This practice would not only make it easier to conduct post-mortems virtually with the help of the resources but also is efficient in the manner that it saves time and money. 

The petition also held that in order to convey the same matter to the Central Government the petitioner had provided them with a representation, however, they did not receive any reply which would satisfactorily answer their appeal. 

DECISION OF THE JUDGES

After both the parties were heard the Division Bench of the High Court consisting of Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma & Justice Alok Kumar Verma has provided the Central and State Government with four weeks in order to file the replies demanding a satisfactory reply to the Public Interest Litigation. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-slams-maharashtra-police-over-four-year-delay-in-framing-charges-seeks-explanation-from-sp-and-trial-court
Trending Judiciary
SC Slams Maharashtra Police Over Four-Year Delay In Framing Charges; Seeks Explanation From SP And Trial Court [Read Order]

The Supreme Court criticises Maharashtra Police for a four-year delay in framing charges and seeks explanations from the SP and Trial Court over prolonged incarceration.

14 November, 2025 10:19 AM
jharkhand-hc-dismisses-pil-seeking-mandatory-disclosure-of-criminal-cases-against-election-candidates
Trending Judiciary
Jharkhand HC Dismisses PIL Seeking Mandatory Disclosure of Criminal Cases Against Election Candidates [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court dismisses PIL seeking mandatory disclosure of pending criminal cases against election candidates, holding no statutory duty exists.

14 November, 2025 11:19 AM

TOP STORIES

state-govt-cannot-appeal-in-cbi-prosecuted-cases-supreme-court-reaffirms-lalu-prasad-yadav-judgment
Trending Judiciary
State Govt Cannot Appeal In CBI-Prosecuted Cases: Supreme Court Reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav Judgment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav ruling, holding that State Governments cannot appeal acquittals in CBI-investigated cases.

10 November, 2025 12:28 PM
managing-director-falls-within-definition-of-employer-under-minimum-wages-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Managing Director Falls Within Definition Of ‘Employer’ Under Minimum Wages Act: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that a Managing Director qualifies as an “employer” under the Minimum Wages Act, upholding liability for unpaid wages.

10 November, 2025 12:48 PM
accused-can-rebut-presumption-of-debt-us-139-ni-act-by-showing-probable-circumstances-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Accused Can Rebut Presumption Of Debt U/S 139 NI Act By Showing Probable Circumstances: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that an accused can rebut the presumption under Section 139 NI Act by proving absence of debt through probable circumstances.

10 November, 2025 01:16 PM
tenant-cannot-challenge-landlords-title-after-decades-of-paying-rent-sc
Trending Judiciary
Tenant Cannot Challenge Landlord’s Title After Decades Of Paying Rent: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that a tenant cannot dispute the landlord’s ownership after paying rent for decades, reinforcing the principle of estoppel in tenancy.

10 November, 2025 01:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email